Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
64th ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1060
- Team average: 1082 against 1057.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1068
38th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1105
- Team average: 1082 against 1057.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1113
vs
Losers
528th ➔ 638th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 1057 against 1082.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 982
30th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1124
- Team average: 1057 against 1082.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1116
Winners
25th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1149
- Opponent rating: 951.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1150
vs
Losers
1016th ➔ 1020th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Opponent rating: 1149.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 950
Winners
72nd ➔ 64th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1052
- Team average: 1084 against 1055.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1060
33rd ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1116
- Team average: 1084 against 1055.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1124
vs
Losers
34th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1113
- Team average: 1055 against 1084.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1105
328th ➔ 528th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 1055 against 1084.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 990
Winners
35th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1108
- Team average: 1109 against 1030.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1113
34th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1111
- Team average: 1109 against 1030.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1116
vs
Losers
67th ➔ 72nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1057
- Team average: 1030 against 1109.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1052
275th ➔ 328th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1003
- Team average: 1030 against 1109.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 998
Winners
76th ➔ 67th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1049
- Team average: 1076 against 1063.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1057
39th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1103
- Team average: 1076 against 1063.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1111
vs
Losers
178th ➔ 275th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1011
- Team average: 1063 against 1076.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1003
33rd ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1116
- Team average: 1063 against 1076.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1108
Winners
291st ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 1047 against 1092.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1011
42nd ➔ 39th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1093
- Team average: 1047 against 1092.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1103
vs
Losers
65th ➔ 76th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1059
- Team average: 1092 against 1047.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1049
29th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1126
- Team average: 1092 against 1047.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1116
Winners
47th ➔ 42nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1084
- Team average: 1077 against 1072.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1093
57th ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1070
- Team average: 1077 against 1072.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1079
vs
Losers
27th ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1135
- Team average: 1072 against 1077.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1126
178th ➔ 291st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 1072 against 1077.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1001
Winners
28th ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1130
- Team average: 1128 against 1052.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1135
30th ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1126
- Team average: 1128 against 1052.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1131
vs
Losers
45th ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Team average: 1052 against 1128.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1084
158th ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1015
- Team average: 1052 against 1128.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1010
Winners
18th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1166
- Opponent rating: 1158.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1175
vs
Losers
21st ➔ 25th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1158
- Opponent rating: 1166.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1149
Winners
20th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1161
- Opponent rating: 1078.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1166
vs
Losers
72nd ➔ 77th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Opponent rating: 1161.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1073
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1288
- Free for all, rated against 995. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1291
vs
Losers
216th ➔ 232nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Free for all, rated against 1288. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 995
unranked ➔ 94th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Free for all, rated against 1288. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 999
299th ➔ 304th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 989
- Free for all, rated against 1288. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 988
Winners
110th ➔ 98th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1032
- Team average: 1049 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1039
60th ➔ 54th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1066
- Team average: 1049 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1073
vs
Losers
651st ➔ 694th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 1004 against 1049.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 975
122nd ➔ 143rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Team average: 1004 against 1049.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1019
Winners
80th ➔ 72nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Opponent rating: 1022.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1078
vs
Losers
179th ➔ 210th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1022
- Opponent rating: 1071.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1015
Winners
205th ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1017
- Opponent rating: 932.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1022
vs
Losers
1053rd ➔ 1062nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 932
- Opponent rating: 1017.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 927
Winners
141st ➔ 122nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1021
- Team average: 1024 against 946.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1026
117th ➔ 110th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Team average: 1024 against 946.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1032
vs
Losers
757th ➔ 772nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Team average: 946 against 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 959
837th ➔ 845th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 929
- Team average: 946 against 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 924
Winners
239th ➔ 205th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Opponent rating: 975.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1017
vs
Losers
889th ➔ 937th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 975
- Opponent rating: 1010.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 968
Winners
65th ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Opponent rating: 1080.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1092
vs
Losers
69th ➔ 80th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1080
- Opponent rating: 1083.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1071
Winners
174th ➔ 141st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 983 against 1006.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1021
787th ➔ 757th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 955
- Team average: 983 against 1006.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 964
vs
Losers
53rd ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1006 against 983.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1066
827th ➔ 837th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 938
- Team average: 1006 against 983.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 929
Winners
325th ➔ 239th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1003
- Opponent rating: 958.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1010
vs
Losers
993rd ➔ 1016th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 958
- Opponent rating: 1003.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 951
Winners
169th ➔ 123rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1007
14th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1087
242nd ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1002
16th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1084
vs
Losers
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1111
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1102
419th ➔ 420th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 940
13th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1069
12th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1079
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1070
Winners
416th ➔ 325th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Opponent rating: 984.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1003
vs
Losers
779th ➔ 889th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 984
- Opponent rating: 994.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 975
Winners
310th ➔ 169th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 988
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 998
17th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1068
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1078
342nd ➔ 242nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 993
19th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1065
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1075
vs
Losers
8th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1121
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1111
407th ➔ 419th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 959
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 949
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1088
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1078
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1079
Clan war[EVIL] vs [HERO] · Game 2 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[EVIL] 1083 → 1089 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Clan ratings: 1083 against 1013.
- Expected result: 60%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1089
32 × (1 - 0.60) × 0.5 = +6 · #1[HERO] 1013 → 1007 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1013
- Clan ratings: 1013 against 1083.
- Expected result: 40%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1007
32 × (0 - 0.40) × 0.5 = -6 · #2These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1154
- Side average: 1112 against 1065.
- Expected result: 57%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1163
40 × (1 - 0.57) × 0.5 = +95th ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Side average: 1112 against 1065.
- Expected result: 57%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1078
40 × (1 - 0.57) × 0.5 = +9vs
Losers
2nd ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1138
- Side average: 1065 against 1112.
- Expected result: 43%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1129
40 × (0 - 0.43) × 0.5 = -916th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Side average: 1065 against 1112.
- Expected result: 43%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 983
40 × (0 - 0.43) × 0.5 = -9Clan war[EVIL] vs [HERO] · Game 1 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[EVIL] 1083 → 1089 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Clan ratings: 1083 against 1013.
- Expected result: 60%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1089
32 × (1 - 0.60) × 0.5 = +6 · #1[HERO] 1013 → 1007 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1013
- Clan ratings: 1013 against 1083.
- Expected result: 40%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1007
32 × (0 - 0.40) × 0.5 = -6 · #2These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1154
- Side average: 1112 against 1065.
- Expected result: 57%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1163
40 × (1 - 0.57) × 0.5 = +95th ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Side average: 1112 against 1065.
- Expected result: 57%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1078
40 × (1 - 0.57) × 0.5 = +9vs
Losers
2nd ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1138
- Side average: 1065 against 1112.
- Expected result: 43%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1129
40 × (0 - 0.43) × 0.5 = -916th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Side average: 1065 against 1112.
- Expected result: 43%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 983
40 × (0 - 0.43) × 0.5 = -9Winners
206th ➔ 160th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 1017 against 1012.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1019
31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1143
- Team average: 1017 against 1012.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1152
890th ➔ 883rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 899
- Team average: 1017 against 1012.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 908
vs
Losers
693rd ➔ 749th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 978
- Team average: 1012 against 1017.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 969
122nd ➔ 155th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1028
- Team average: 1012 against 1017.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1019
117th ➔ 145th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1030
- Team average: 1012 against 1017.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1021
Winners
163rd ➔ 150th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Opponent rating: 991.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1033
vs
Losers
538th ➔ 779th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Opponent rating: 1026.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 984
Winners
25th ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1178
- Team average: 1218 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1179
32nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1141
- Team average: 1218 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1142
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1336
- Team average: 1218 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1337
vs
Losers
693rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 979
- Team average: 1013 against 1218.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 978
117th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1031
- Team average: 1013 against 1218.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1030
122nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 1013 against 1218.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1028
Winners
10th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1113
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1121
419th ➔ 407th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 959
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1080
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1088
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1081
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1089
vs
Losers
173rd ➔ 310th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 988
14th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1076
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1068
259th ➔ 342nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 983
16th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1073
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1065
Clan war[EVIL] vs [HERO] · Game 2 of 2War: [HERO] won 2-0[EVIL] 1093 → 1083 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1093
- Clan ratings: 1093 against 1003.
- Expected result: 63%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1083
32 × (0 - 0.63) × 0.5 = -10 · #1[HERO] 1003 → 1013 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1003
- Clan ratings: 1003 against 1093.
- Expected result: 37%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1013
32 × (1 - 0.37) × 0.5 = +10 · #2These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
3rd ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1126
- Side average: 1063 against 1124.
- Expected result: 41%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1138
40 × (1 - 0.41) × 0.5 = +1214th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Side average: 1063 against 1124.
- Expected result: 41%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1012
40 × (1 - 0.41) × 0.5 = +12vs
Losers
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1166
- Side average: 1124 against 1063.
- Expected result: 59%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1154
40 × (0 - 0.59) × 0.5 = -124th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1081
- Side average: 1124 against 1063.
- Expected result: 59%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1069
40 × (0 - 0.59) × 0.5 = -12Winners
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1104
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1113
420th ➔ 419th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 942
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 951
17th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1080
15th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1072
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1081
vs
Losers
124th ➔ 173rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1005
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 996
12th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1085
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1076
148th ➔ 259th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
13th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1082
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1073

















