← Home

Atemk

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 419,440 / 20,000 XP
560 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
983
ELO
#356
0W 2L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
913
ELO
#906
20W 42L · 32%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#162
#162
Season 1
1,017 pts
2W / 0L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#717
#717
Season 1
808 pts
28W / 64L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
sherxan
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
McBraavos
8W 4L
67%
Jackasss
6W 2L
75%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Atemk & pullakissa
0W 6L
0%
Atemk & Deatheater
3W 2L
60%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Keso & WizardVale
4W 1L
80%
THE HELL & ydfhgc
3W 0L
100%
71 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 904
  • Team average: 976 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 913
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:48·2026-10-07 17:27 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 907
  • Team average: 971 against 1084.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 904
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:06:38·2026-10-06 18:44 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 911
  • Team average: 880 against 968.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 907
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:28·2026-10-06 17:40 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 910
  • Team average: 1176 against 1008.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 911
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:29:49·2026-10-06 15:17 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 911
  • Team average: 964 against 1181.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 910
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:09·2026-10-06 15:00 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 904
  • Team average: 997 against 964.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 911
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:56·2026-10-05 18:05 UTC
LBFME1Enedwaith II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:20:17·2026-10-05 14:48 UTC
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 910
  • Team average: 924 against 989.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 904
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:42·2026-10-04 13:59 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 901
  • Team average: 973 against 974.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 910
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:34·2026-10-03 16:57 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 906
  • Team average: 976 against 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 901
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:49·2026-10-03 16:47 UTC