← HomeLEVEL
Level 160 / 2,000 XP
1,940 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
RotWKEdain · 1v1
0W 1L · 0%
LAST 5 SEASONS
No finished seasons on this patch yet.
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
KingZiggy
19W 3L, 86% over 22 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Cruzificador & KingZiggy & Lord Ziggy
15W 3L
83%
Cruzificador & McBraavos
4W 6L
40%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
McBraavos & Sauromann
1W 3L
25%
ESCOBAR & MAGAA & QORA LOQQI
1W 3L
25%
67 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
The Ring Is Destroyed
1.1% of players
The Wide World
only 44 players
Called to the Lists
Level 1 of 2
1.6% of players
Elf-friend
Level 1 of 3
only 164 players
Many Tongues
1.6% of players
Bane of the Enemy
Level 2 of 3
1.3% of players
Lord of the Mark
Level 3 of 4
1.2% of players
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
Warden of Patch 2.22
only 157 players
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1122
- Team average: 1128 against 1077.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1128
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:15:59·2026-10-25 20:47 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1106
- Team average: 1027 against 1117.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1102
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:51·2026-10-25 15:17 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1099
- Team average: 1106 against 1060.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1106
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:19·2026-10-25 15:06 UTC 
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1093
- Team average: 1100 against 1032.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1099
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:51·2026-10-24 14:55 UTCLBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1131
- Team average: 1065 against 1046.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1122
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:13:49·2026-10-24 14:27 UTC WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1084
- Team average: 963 against 988.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1093
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:26:18·2026-10-24 13:55 UTC 
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1017 against 960.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1084
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:52·2026-10-24 13:39 UTC WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1077 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1078
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:28:12·2026-10-22 13:35 UTC 
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1126
- Team average: 1128 against 1052.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1131
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:15:55·2026-10-20 01:54 UTC 
LBFME1BelfalasHow this was worked out- Rating before: 996
- Free for all, rated against 1275. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 995
Rohan·FFA·00:09:59·2026-10-19 16:39 UTC
