← Home

Dinkleebee

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 414,650 / 20,000 XP
5,350 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Elves
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Show all 7
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1006
ELO
#262
18W 16L · 53%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
991
ELO
#167
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#824
#824
Season 1
988 pts
3W / 5L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
IvanaHave6
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
IvanaHave6
1W 0L
100%
MayShadowFax
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Dinkleebee & IvanaHave6
1W 0L
100%
Dinkleebee & MayShadowFax
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
DRS SIME & Pearson973
1W 0L
100%
deHaHaHa & PXEL
1W 0L
100%
10 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Have 25 friends.
The Fellowship
Level 1 of 2
3.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 946.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1006
Men·1 versus 1·00:08:26·2026-11-01 10:41 UTC
WRotWKRhudaur HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 993
  • Opponent rating: 953.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1000
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:33·2026-11-01 10:32 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1002
  • Opponent rating: 1009.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 993
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:10:29·2026-10-30 19:10 UTC
WRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Opponent rating: 1073.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1002
Men·1 versus 1·00:19:37·2026-10-29 18:46 UTC
LRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Men·1 versus 1·00:16:48·2026-10-08 20:40 UTC
LRotWKEmerald IsletHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Opponent rating: 1054.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1000
Men·1 versus 1·00:17:52·2026-10-08 20:17 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Opponent rating: 1251.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1017
Men·1 versus 1·00:09:34·2026-09-24 22:18 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1019
  • Opponent rating: 1184.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1018
Men·1 versus 1·00:33:08·2026-09-23 19:53 UTC
WRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1013
  • Opponent rating: 961.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1019
Men·1 versus 1·00:16:49·2026-09-19 16:32 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1020
  • Opponent rating: 1065.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1013
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:08:31·2026-09-15 17:59 UTC