← Home

DrinksnOats

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 24,520 / 5,000 XP
480 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1040
ELO
#98
10W 6L · 62%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
980
ELO
#672
2W 5L · 29%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#45
#45
Season 1
1,094 pts
15W / 3L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#61
#61
Season 1
1,072 pts
11W / 1L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#44
#44
Season 1
1,017 pts
2W / 0L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NeYo
5W 0L, 100% over 5 games
NeYo
5W 0L
100%
JAN97Sy
4W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DrinksnOats & Vinohrad1
1W 1L
50%
DAENERYS & DrinksnOats & Noob_player
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
DOTER. & LegioCZ & Lord Martin
1W 0L
100%
JOkerC & Seth99Svk
1W 0L
100%
60 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.1% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
map
LBFME1Unknown map-2
Unknown army·3 versus 3 NM·Dodged, no game was played·2026-10-16 22:05 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Team average: 957 against 1058.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 1042
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:31·2026-10-09 16:43 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1038
  • Team average: 971 against 1020.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1031
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:27·2026-08-28 13:43 UTC
LBFME1Wold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 986
  • Team average: 1008 against 1069.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 980
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:11:47·2026-08-21 16:03 UTC
LBFME1Crossroads IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 995
  • Team average: 989 against 982.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 986
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:13:50·2026-08-21 15:46 UTC
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Team average: 1011 against 961.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 995
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:12:30·2026-08-21 15:25 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1045
  • Team average: 1021 against 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1038
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:14·2026-08-18 19:51 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1041
  • Team average: 1050 against 945.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1045
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:00:50·2026-08-18 19:41 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Team average: 1058 against 1026.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1041
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:15·2026-08-18 19:30 UTC
WBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 981
  • Team average: 1012 against 987.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 989
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:13:22·2026-08-18 19:09 UTC