← Home

GhostRageThe Ring Is Destroyed

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 38,470 / 10,000 XP
1,530 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1012
ELO
#182
4W 3L · 57%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
1007
ELO
#131
2W 2L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
991
ELO
#318
1W 7L · 12%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
991
ELO
#692
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
978
ELO
#747
24W 35L · 41%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#234
#234
Season 1
1,004 pts
11W / 12L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
tom12
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Double K
20W 24L
45%
DidiDrogba
10W 12L
45%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DidiDrogba & Double K & GhostRage
7W 5L
58%
Double K & GhostRage & SET777
3W 4L
43%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
asdfqwe & LordACE
1W 0L
100%
A3r3t3 & ALFRASHGUL
1W 0L
100%
70 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Complete the entire good campaign.
The Ring Is Destroyed
1.1% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Wold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1004
  • Team average: 997 against 980.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1012
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:09:54·2026-10-25 19:05 UTC
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Team average: 1018 against 1049.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1004
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:04:41·2026-10-24 18:35 UTC
LBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Team average: 1048 against 1095.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:13:03·2026-10-24 17:40 UTC
LBFME1Udun IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 980 against 1044.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1001
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:12:50·2026-10-24 17:23 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Team average: 937 against 1165.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +12.
  • Rating after: 978
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:03·2026-10-24 12:32 UTC
WBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 961
  • Team average: 1018 against 944.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 966
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:25·2026-10-23 19:19 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 967
  • Team average: 972 against 1024.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 961
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:37·2026-10-23 18:57 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Team average: 903 against 990.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 967
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:27·2026-10-23 18:37 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Team average: 932 against 1095.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 971
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:58·2026-10-23 13:29 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 975
  • Team average: 976 against 1088.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 972
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:26·2026-10-23 13:12 UTC