← Home

Glamdring

📍 Andorra
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 190 / 2,000 XP
1,910 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKEdain · 3v3
990
ELO
0W 1L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Mansaw
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Salamanda
2W 9L
18%
gigagiga50
2W 6L
25%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Glamdring & Salamanda
2W 6L
25%
gigagiga50 & Glamdring
2W 4L
33%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Galmod & gigagiga50
3W 0L
100%
gigagiga50 & Salamanda
2W 1L
67%
62 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Have 25 friends.
The Fellowship
Level 1 of 2
3.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKFurten des CirilHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lothlorien·4 versus 4·00:41:50·2026-10-09 16:28 UTC
WRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·3 versus 3·00:28:11·2026-10-09 15:38 UTC
LRotWKWüstenschrein von HaradHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Harad·2 versus 2·00:41:40·2026-09-13 13:49 UTC
WRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Misty Mountains·2 versus 2·00:33:02·2026-09-12 19:58 UTC
LRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3·00:34:42·2026-09-08 22:10 UTC
LRotWKDer Fluss AdornHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men of the West·4 versus 4·00:20:13·2026-09-06 19:42 UTC
LRotWKEiswüste von ForodwaithHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lothlorien·3 versus 3·00:40:59·2026-09-06 18:28 UTC
LRotWKSchlachtenhöhen IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Misty Mountains·2 versus 2·00:24:21·2026-09-06 16:21 UTC
LRotWKBaranduinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Opponent rating: 1093.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 968
Lothlorien·1 versus 1·00:24:01·2026-09-01 19:16 UTC
LRotWKWüstenschrein von HaradHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:28:26·2026-08-30 16:06 UTC