← Home

IkeHS

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,200 / 5,000 XP
2,800 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
999
ELO
#114
2W 2L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
955
ELO
#1006
0W 7L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
887
ELO
#1912
3W 18L · 14%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Loop
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Loop
2W 0L
100%
Pshebi
1W 1L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
IkeHS & pigglywigg
0W 2L
0%
IkeHS & Loop & Pshebi
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Felipemito & Leoo & Makaa
2W 0L
100%
Masho & Pshebi
0W 2L
0%
24 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLostAny queueSolo queueParty games
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 893
  • Opponent rating: 958.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 887
Men·1 versus 1·00:22:02·2026-07-29 22:26 UTC
LRotWKFirien ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 956
  • Team average: 978 against 1143.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 955
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:24:26·2026-07-29 22:06 UTC
LRotWKSouth RoadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 1011 against 1022.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 999
Men·3 versus 3·00:29:51·2026-07-29 18:05 UTC
LRotWKFrostfall CanyonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 957
  • Team average: 968 against 1142.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 956
Men·2 versus 2·00:01:15·2026-07-29 01:31 UTC
WRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 883
  • Opponent rating: 925.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 893
Men·1 versus 1·00:18:29·2026-07-28 09:38 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 893
  • Opponent rating: 858.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 883
Men·1 versus 1·00:20:05·2026-07-28 09:16 UTC
LRotWKBrandy Hills CanyonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1016
  • Team average: 1002 against 1010.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·3 versus 3·00:22:42·2026-07-27 23:27 UTC
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 897
  • Opponent rating: 984.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 893
Men·1 versus 1·00:08:16·2026-07-27 18:14 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 903
  • Opponent rating: 954.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 897
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:05:32·2026-07-27 15:40 UTC
WRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 895
  • Opponent rating: 866.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 903
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:26:04·2026-07-27 01:47 UTC