← HomeLEVEL
Level 663,670 / 80,000 XP
16,330 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
248W 132L · 65%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
20W 6L · 77%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
4W 0L · 100%
Clan wars ladder
A separate ladder from quickmatch. Rated per clan war: two games against another clan.
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#38
Season 1
1,159 pts
123W / 69L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Morhamedh
15W 4L, 79% over 19 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Khalid Kashmiri & Morhamedh
12W 4L
75%
Khalid Kashmiri & Yusuf.Mehmet
4W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
boubougnoule & Mitrandirtr
1W 0L
100%
40 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
Called to the Lists
Level 1 of 2
1.9% of players
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.3% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Race of Men
only 43 players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1204
- Opponent rating: 1296.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1200
Solo queue 
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:15:21·2026-11-10 15:09 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1209
- Opponent rating: 1291.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1204
Solo queue 
Men·1 versus 1·00:15:29·2026-11-10 14:51 UTC
LRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1081
- Team average: 1084 against 1045.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1071
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:19:08·2026-11-01 17:56 UTC
WRotWKEast CarrockHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1078 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1081
Men·2 versus 2·00:04:51·2026-11-01 17:40 UTC 
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1218
- Opponent rating: 1200.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1209
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:17:13·2026-11-01 17:02 UTC 
LRotWKFirien ForestHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1085
- Team average: 1088 against 1054.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1075
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:23:52·2026-11-01 16:26 UTC 
WRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1079
- Team average: 1082 against 1032.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1085
Men·2 versus 2·00:09:16·2026-11-01 16:15 UTC 
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1227
- Opponent rating: 1205.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1218
Men·1 versus 1·00:23:19·2026-11-01 15:48 UTC LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1230
- Opponent rating: 1351.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1227
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:26·2026-11-01 14:12 UTC 
WRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1229
- Opponent rating: 1068.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1230
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:14:04·2026-10-31 17:31 UTC
