← HomeLEVEL
Level 641,430 / 80,000 XP
38,570 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7

Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
3W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
31W 14L · 69%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
7W 8L · 47%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
12W 14L · 46%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#84
Season 1
1,072 pts
16W / 5L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Belisarius
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
french tax & Loop
4W 2L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ASTRO1 & Charizard. & DAntehelp & deHaHaHa
2W 2L
50%
Felipemito & Leoo & Makaa
2W 0L
100%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Loremaster
only 116 players
Many Tongues
Level 1 of 2
only 152 players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players

LRotWKLast BridgeHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:10:152025-11-11 14:46 UTC
WRotWKEast CarrockHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1037 against 1017.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1016
Elves2 versus 200:25:192025-11-10 22:33 UTC
WRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:22:202025-11-10 21:59 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men1 versus 100:16:482025-11-10 21:05 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor1 versus 100:10:052025-11-10 20:51 UTC
WRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor1 versus 100:44:092025-11-05 21:18 UTC
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves1 versus 100:08:362025-11-05 21:07 UTC
WRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:07:502025-10-28 21:01 UTC
WRotWKEast CarrockHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1017 against 1004.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1008
Isengard2 versus 200:07:382025-10-21 19:48 UTC
LRotWKSouth MirkwoodHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1004 against 1013.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1000
Men2 versus 200:01:572025-10-21 19:44 UTC