← HomeLEVEL
Level 641,430 / 80,000 XP
38,570 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7

Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
3W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
31W 14L · 69%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
7W 8L · 47%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
12W 14L · 46%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#84
Season 1
1,072 pts
16W / 5L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Belisarius
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
french tax & Loop
4W 2L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ASTRO1 & Charizard. & DAntehelp & deHaHaHa
2W 2L
50%
Felipemito & Leoo & Makaa
2W 0L
100%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Loremaster
only 116 players
Many Tongues
Level 1 of 2
only 152 players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players

LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1048
- Opponent rating: 803.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -12.
- Rating after: 1036
Elves1 versus 100:00:542026-07-05 20:56 UTC
WRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1044
- Opponent rating: 946.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1048
Dwarves1 versus 100:06:532026-07-05 20:47 UTC
LRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1045
- Opponent rating: 1300.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1044
Elves1 versus 100:04:182026-06-27 20:29 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1052
- Opponent rating: 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1045
Isengard1 versus 100:08:452026-06-27 20:12 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1062
- Opponent rating: 1015.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1052
Isengard1 versus 100:08:192026-06-20 21:07 UTC
LRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1068
- Opponent rating: 1120.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1062
Isengard1 versus 100:12:482026-06-20 20:49 UTC
WRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1066
- Opponent rating: 926.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1068
Mordor1 versus 100:09:132026-06-20 20:36 UTC
WRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1061
- Opponent rating: 990.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1066
Mordor1 versus 100:08:132026-06-19 19:20 UTC
WRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1060
- Opponent rating: 894.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1061
Men1 versus 100:04:442026-06-19 19:09 UTC
WRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1051
- Opponent rating: 1063.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1060
Men1 versus 100:05:072026-06-19 19:02 UTC