← HomeLEVEL
Level 641,430 / 80,000 XP
38,570 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7

Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
3W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
31W 14L · 69%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
7W 8L · 47%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
12W 14L · 46%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#84
Season 1
1,072 pts
16W / 5L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Belisarius
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
french tax & Loop
4W 2L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ASTRO1 & Charizard. & DAntehelp & deHaHaHa
2W 2L
50%
Felipemito & Leoo & Makaa
2W 0L
100%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Loremaster
only 116 players
Many Tongues
Level 1 of 2
only 152 players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players

LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1009
- Opponent rating: 1131.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1006
Mordor1 versus 100:12:332026-06-07 19:31 UTC
LRotWKFar HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 1003 against 1069.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1000
Angmar2 versus 200:10:292026-06-05 19:06 UTC
WRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Opponent rating: 1021.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
Elves1 versus 100:13:012026-06-05 18:49 UTC
WRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:19:482026-05-13 19:57 UTC
WRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves1 versus 100:16:052026-05-13 19:39 UTC
WRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:05:082026-05-12 14:15 UTC
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:16:522026-05-12 13:23 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men1 versus 100:12:092026-05-06 22:02 UTC
WRotWKBuckland IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 994 against 1016.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1006
Isengard2 versus 200:29:182026-05-02 16:02 UTC
WRotWKBuckland IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 989
- Team average: 1015 against 999.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 997
Dwarves2 versus 200:15:462026-05-02 15:37 UTC