← Home

Luke6193

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 419,030 / 20,000 XP
970 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Show all 7
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1180
ELO
#54
102W 70L · 59%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1106
ELO
#17
26W 14L · 65%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1009
ELO
#60
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
998
ELO
#58
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
974
ELO
#174
4W 7L · 36%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Hosamkh
5W 0L, 100% over 5 games
HaroonZ
4W 2L
67%
ZERO
4W 2L
67%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Luke6193 & ZERO
4W 2L
67%
Hosamkh & Luke6193
4W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
.B.R. & PepitoBR
1W 4L
20%
Hasbulla & Spartaco Gamer
4W 0L
100%
60 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.3% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1175
  • Opponent rating: 1096.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1180
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:10:58·2026-11-07 23:26 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1177
  • Opponent rating: 1312.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1175
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:18:17·2026-11-07 23:07 UTC
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1173
  • Opponent rating: 1073.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1177
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:10:16·2026-11-07 22:52 UTC
LRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1175
  • Opponent rating: 1310.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1173
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:44·2026-11-07 22:38 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1186
  • Opponent rating: 1084.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -11.
  • Rating after: 1175
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:14·2026-11-07 22:11 UTC
LRotWKHobbiton HillHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1114
  • Team average: 1046 against 1074.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1106
Men·2 versus 2·00:31:55·2026-11-07 21:35 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1190
  • Opponent rating: 1298.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1186
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:21:32·2026-11-07 21:06 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1184
  • Opponent rating: 1118.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1190
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:00:10·2026-11-07 21:02 UTC
LRotWKFirien ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1119
  • Team average: 1098 against 1183.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1114
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:13:23·2026-11-07 20:39 UTC
WRotWKNumenor's DownfallHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1112
  • Team average: 1056 against 1021.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1119
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:14:27·2026-11-06 23:57 UTC