← Home

NoName1The White Hand

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 665,830 / 80,000 XP
14,170 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Mordor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
999
ELO
#108
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
996
ELO
#448
1W 2L · 33%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#675
#675
Season 1
982 pts
11W / 15L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#590
#590
Season 1
973 pts
29W / 33L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#187
#187
Season 1
992 pts
1W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
FFA · BFME1
BEST
#238
#238
Season 1
970 pts
1W / 15L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NeYo
12W 2L, 86% over 14 games
LegioCZ
7W 9L
44%
GaNdAlFO
7W 9L
44%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
GaNdAlFO & NoName1
7W 9L
44%
NoName1 & Tiger6
5W 5L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Fridolin & Last_Istar
5W 0L
100%
beko & Dodo & Madamin
0W 4L
0%
68 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 500 ranked games. Ranger of the North · 7 Aug 2026 Captain of Gondor · 7 Aug 2026
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Lose 500 games and keep fighting.
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
Play 500 games as Isengard.
The White Hand
only 75 players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Team average: 1022 against 973.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 996
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:19·2026-10-21 15:05 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 990
  • Team average: 979 against 1208.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 989
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:05:59·2026-10-21 14:31 UTC
LBFME1FFA BucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Free for all, rated against 1250. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 999
Isengard·FFA·00:54:10·2026-10-21 14:19 UTC
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1012 against 975.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 990
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:46·2026-10-20 17:51 UTC
LBFME1FFA BucklandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·FFA·00:14:02·2026-07-06 20:56 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:13·2026-07-03 11:52 UTC
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:00·2026-06-29 17:18 UTC
LBFME1FFA HarlondHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·FFA·00:46:20·2026-06-27 20:56 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:29:34·2026-06-27 19:47 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:28·2026-06-27 19:27 UTC