← Home

Robika491

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1300 / 2,000 XP
1,700 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
998
ELO
#361
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
993
ELO
#397
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
974
ELO
#854
0W 3L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Atemk
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Atemk
0W 1L
0%
Rohannn.
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Atemk & Robika491 & Rohannn.
0W 1L
0%
Keso & Robika491
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Lord Ziggy & Monarch_01 & RAFA2067
0W 1L
0%
legooo & UgIuk
0W 1L
0%
1 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKFenmarchHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:17:58·2026-08-19 11:29 UTC
vs _Gyurza
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·1 versus 1·00:13:58·2026-08-18 08:57 UTC
vs killian_j
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·1 versus 1·00:15:28·2026-08-18 08:40 UTC
vs Danix99
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:06:59·2026-08-12 15:56 UTC
vs kingmo
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 918 against 1046.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 998
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:59·2026-08-11 18:30 UTC
vs RAFA2067, Monarch_01, Lord Ziggy, Atemk, Rohannn.
LBFME1Dorwinion IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 987 against 1034.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 993
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:14:37·2026-08-09 18:56 UTC
vs Keso, legooo, UgIuk
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:14:52·2026-08-09 18:38 UTC
vs BFVESHNIK
LBFME1WestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:16:23·2026-08-09 18:20 UTC
vs BFVESHNIK
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:09:47·2026-08-08 11:47 UTC
vs Syler