← Home

Rozza

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1100 / 2,000 XP
1,900 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#239
1W 0L · 100%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
ChaosV2
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Arran
0W 4L
0%
ChaosV2
2W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
ChaosV2 & Rozza
2W 0L
100%
dealWithit & jalil & Rozza
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
chicken899 & Clifdoe & Rohanero
1W 0L
100%
Arran & Metcow123
1W 0L
100%
53 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 985.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:26:09·2026-08-27 20:27 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 962
  • Team average: 928 against 1088.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 961
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:36·2026-08-27 20:13 UTC
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 964
  • Team average: 1039 against 1177.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 962
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:53·2026-08-26 21:35 UTC
LBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Team average: 1002 against 1086.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 964
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:58·2026-08-26 21:13 UTC
LBFME1FFA Wold 2.22How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·FFA·01:08:01·2026-08-26 20:57 UTC
LBFME1FFA BucklandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·FFA·00:20:56·2026-08-25 20:01 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 968
  • Team average: 980 against 1066.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 963
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:22·2026-08-25 19:37 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 977
  • Team average: 987 against 967.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 968
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:10·2026-08-24 22:12 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:11:02·2026-08-24 20:44 UTC
LBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1016
  • Team average: 1005 against 1027.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1008
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:08:24·2026-08-24 20:17 UTC