← HomeLEVEL
Level 419,730 / 20,000 XP
270 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1W 4L · 20%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
116W 137L · 46%
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Username
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
SoliTank & Username
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Felipemito & Makaa
0W 2L
0%
Bleskmay & SKT Ruzo
1W 0L
100%
8 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
Called to the Lists
Level 1 of 2
1.8% of players
Elf-friend
Level 1 of 3
only 169 players

LRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out- Rating before: 956
- Opponent rating: 1031.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 951
Elves·1 versus 1·00:21:52·2026-11-06 09:01 UTC
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 955
- Opponent rating: 750.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 956
Elves·1 versus 1·00:24:24·2026-11-06 00:02 UTC
LRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out- Rating before: 964
- Opponent rating: 943.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 955
Elves·1 versus 1·00:23:52·2026-11-05 19:14 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 970
- Opponent rating: 1032.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 964
Elves·1 versus 1·00:16:20·2026-11-05 18:50 UTC
WRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- Rating before: 960
- Opponent rating: 993.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 970
Elves·1 versus 1·00:25:55·2026-11-05 18:13 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 951
- Opponent rating: 945.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 960
Elves·1 versus 1·00:23:40·2026-11-05 14:24 UTC
LRotWKFenmarchHow this was worked out- Rating before: 959
- Opponent rating: 978.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 951
Elves·1 versus 1·00:21:55·2026-11-05 10:06 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 960
- Opponent rating: 1129.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 959
Elves·1 versus 1·00:18:37·2026-11-05 09:30 UTC
LRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 966
- Opponent rating: 1029.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 960
Elves·1 versus 1·00:28:18·2026-11-04 20:16 UTC
WRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- Rating before: 959
- Opponent rating: 923.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 966
Elves·1 versus 1·00:19:36·2026-11-04 19:48 UTC