← Home

fefo

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,560 / 2,000 XP
440 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#294
2W 1L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
991
ELO
#137
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
982
ELO
#217
0W 2L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
947
ELO
#1568
4W 13L · 24%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
tersites
2W 3L, 40% over 5 games
tersites
2W 3L
40%
Chomper
0W 2L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
fefo & tersites
2W 1L
67%
Chomper & fefo & Salorth
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Snegur & t-bone
1W 0L
100%
Azimjon48 & t-bone
1W 0L
100%
8 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 937
  • Opponent rating: 983.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 947
Elves·1 versus 1·00:59:11·2026-10-17 15:19 UTC
LRotWKMisty MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 942
  • Opponent rating: 1018.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 937
Unknown army·1 versus 1·00:00:00·2026-10-17 15:18 UTC
WRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 941
  • Opponent rating: 766.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 942
Elves·1 versus 1·00:05:05·2026-10-17 15:09 UTC
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Opponent rating: 1027.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 941
Elves·1 versus 1·00:10:26·2026-10-11 20:18 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 948
  • Opponent rating: 1087.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 946
Elves·1 versus 1·00:18:44·2026-10-10 12:37 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 950
  • Opponent rating: 1085.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 948
Elves·1 versus 1·00:07:15·2026-10-10 12:27 UTC
WRotWKArchetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 944
  • Opponent rating: 894.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 950
Elves·1 versus 1·00:26:22·2026-10-08 16:39 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 945
  • Opponent rating: 1096.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 944
Elves·1 versus 1·00:17:29·2026-10-06 22:43 UTC
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Opponent rating: 895.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 945
Elves·1 versus 1·00:48:20·2026-09-20 18:37 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Opponent rating: 969.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 955
Elves·1 versus 1·00:23:32·2026-09-20 18:09 UTC
vs DIST