Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
879th ➔ 870th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 933
- Team average: 970 against 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 944
216th ➔ 153rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 970 against 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 1019
vs
Losers
296th ➔ 487th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 1080 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 991
21st ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1158
- Team average: 1080 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1147
Winners
28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1135
- Team average: 1053 against 998.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1141
768th ➔ 723rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 972
- Team average: 1053 against 998.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 978
vs
Losers
895th ➔ 898th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 917
- Team average: 998 against 1053.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 911
58th ➔ 61st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1079
- Team average: 998 against 1053.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1073
Winners
912th ➔ 909th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 886
- Team average: 931 against 968.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 896
722nd ➔ 621st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 977
- Team average: 931 against 968.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 987
vs
Losers
193rd ➔ 311th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 968 against 931.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1000
887th ➔ 895th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 927
- Team average: 968 against 931.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 917
Winners
808th ➔ 768th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 962
- Team average: 1027 against 1068.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 972
50th ➔ 44th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1093
- Team average: 1027 against 1068.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1103
vs
Losers
556th ➔ 692nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1068 against 1027.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 981
26th ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1145
- Team average: 1068 against 1027.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1135
Clan war[LAST] vs [MM] · Game 1 of 2War: [LAST] won 2-0[LAST] 1059 → 1068 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1059
- Clan ratings: 1059 against 907.
- Expected result: 71%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- Rating after: 1068
32 × (1 - 0.71) = +9 · #2[MM] 907 → 888 How this was worked out- Rating before: 907
- Clan ratings: 907 against 1059.
- Expected result: 29%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 64, doubled during a clan's first 10 wars.
- Rating after: 888
64 × (0 - 0.29) = -19 · #4Placement war, counts double: Ulf Hviti, MMKurumirWinners
4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1036
- Side average: 1055 against 958.
- Expected result: 64%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1051
40 × (1 - 0.64) = +15
3rd ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Side average: 1055 against 958.
- Expected result: 64%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1089
40 × (1 - 0.64) = +15vs
Losers
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 954
- Side average: 958 against 1055.
- Expected result: 36%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
- Rating after: 925
80 × (0 - 0.36) = -29
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Side average: 958 against 1055.
- Expected result: 36%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
- Rating after: 932
80 × (0 - 0.36) = -29
Winners
933rd ➔ 925th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 940
- Team average: 969 against 1008.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 950
337th ➔ 115th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 969 against 1008.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1008
vs
Losers
124th ➔ 346th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 1008 against 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 996
101st ➔ 141st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1011
- Team average: 1008 against 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1001
Winners
802nd ➔ 767th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 963
- Team average: 1049 against 1051.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 972
28th ➔ 26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1136
- Team average: 1049 against 1051.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1145
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 556th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1051 against 1049.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
45th ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1102
- Team average: 1051 against 1049.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1093
Winners
90th ➔ 84th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1044
- Team average: 1047 against 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1049
81st ➔ 75th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1050
- Team average: 1047 against 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1055
vs
Losers
761st ➔ 784th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 972
- Team average: 969 against 1047.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 967
785th ➔ 807th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 967
- Team average: 969 against 1047.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 962
Winners
151st ➔ 125th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 1003 against 926.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1006
124th ➔ 101st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 1003 against 926.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1011
vs
Losers
929th ➔ 933rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 945
- Team average: 926 against 1003.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 940
944th ➔ 945th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 908
- Team average: 926 against 1003.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 903
Winners
371st ➔ 151st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 997 against 932.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1001
unranked ➔ 124th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 997 against 932.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1006
vs
Losers
943rd ➔ 944th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 914
- Team average: 932 against 997.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 908
923rd ➔ 929th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 932 against 997.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 945
Winners
52nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Team average: 1064 against 977.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1088
88th ➔ 81st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1045
- Team average: 1064 against 977.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1050
vs
Losers
692nd ➔ 721st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 977 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 977
761st ➔ 785th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 972
- Team average: 977 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 967
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 991 against 998.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1019
106th ➔ 103rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Team average: 991 against 998.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 982
vs
Winners
vs
Losers
105th ➔ 106th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 981
- Opponent rating: 998.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 973
Winners
61st ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Team average: 1168 against 1169.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1083
6th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1262
- Team average: 1168 against 1169.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1271
vs
Winners
60th ➔ 57th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1073
- Team average: 1038 against 978.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1079
269th ➔ 194th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1004
- Team average: 1038 against 978.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1010
vs
Losers
423rd ➔ 602nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 978 against 1038.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 988
802nd ➔ 828th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 963
- Team average: 978 against 1038.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 957
Winners
2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1314
- Team average: 1190 against 1146.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1321
64th ➔ 61st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1067
- Team average: 1190 against 1146.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1074
vs
Losers
136th ➔ 158th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1146 against 1190.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1017
5th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1269
- Team average: 1146 against 1190.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1262
Winners
2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1313
- Team average: 1290 against 1046.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1314
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1268
- Team average: 1290 against 1046.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1269
vs
Losers
63rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1068
- Team average: 1046 against 1290.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1067
134th ➔ 136th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1025
- Team average: 1046 against 1290.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1024
Winners
127th ➔ 120th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Team average: 1047 against 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1033
64th ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1067
- Team average: 1047 against 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1073
vs
Losers
780th ➔ 802nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Team average: 984 against 1047.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 963
unranked ➔ 423rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 984 against 1047.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 994
Clan war[LAST] vs [GC] · Game 2 of 2War: [GC] won 2-0[LAST] 1066 → 1059 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1066
- Clan ratings: 1066 against 1106.
- Expected result: 44%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1059
32 × (0 - 0.44) × 0.5 = -7 · #2[GC] 1106 → 1113 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1106
- Clan ratings: 1106 against 1066.
- Expected result: 56%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1113
32 × (1 - 0.56) × 0.5 = +7 · #1These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
9th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Side average: 980 against 1081.
- Expected result: 36%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1012
40 × (1 - 0.36) = +26
11th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Side average: 980 against 1081.
- Expected result: 36%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 999
40 × (1 - 0.36) = +26vs
Losers
4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Side average: 1081 against 980.
- Expected result: 64%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1036
40 × (0 - 0.64) = -26
2nd ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1100
- Side average: 1081 against 980.
- Expected result: 64%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1074
40 × (0 - 0.64) = -26
Winners
2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1305
- Team average: 1182 against 1154.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1313
70th ➔ 63rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1060
- Team average: 1182 against 1154.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1068
vs
Losers
120th ➔ 134th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 1154 against 1182.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1025
4th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1276
- Team average: 1154 against 1182.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1268
Winners
277th ➔ 193rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1004
- Team average: 1050 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1010
50th ➔ 46th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1096
- Team average: 1050 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1102
vs
Losers
868th ➔ 871st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 943
- Team average: 997 against 1050.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 937
79th ➔ 86th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1051
- Team average: 997 against 1050.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1045
Clan war[LAST] vs [GC] · Game 1 of 2War: [GC] won 2-0[LAST] 1066 → 1059 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1066
- Clan ratings: 1066 against 1106.
- Expected result: 44%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1059
32 × (0 - 0.44) × 0.5 = -7 · #2[GC] 1106 → 1113 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1106
- Clan ratings: 1106 against 1066.
- Expected result: 56%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1113
32 × (1 - 0.56) × 0.5 = +7 · #1These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
9th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Side average: 980 against 1081.
- Expected result: 36%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1012
40 × (1 - 0.36) = +26
11th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Side average: 980 against 1081.
- Expected result: 36%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 999
40 × (1 - 0.36) = +26vs
Losers
4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Side average: 1081 against 980.
- Expected result: 64%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1036
40 × (0 - 0.64) = -26
2nd ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1100
- Side average: 1081 against 980.
- Expected result: 64%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 1074
40 × (0 - 0.64) = -26
Winners
122nd ➔ 93rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 1022 against 999.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1014
56th ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1038
- Team average: 1022 against 999.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1046
vs
Winners
50th ➔ 45th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1092
- Team average: 1031 against 1061.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1102
766th ➔ 707th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 1031 against 1061.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 981
vs
Losers
23rd ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1151
- Team average: 1061 against 1031.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1141
773rd ➔ 813th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 1061 against 1031.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 961
Winners
740th ➔ 706th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 974
- Team average: 983 against 935.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 981
423rd ➔ 321st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 983 against 935.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1000
vs
Losers
913th ➔ 915th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 873
- Team average: 935 against 983.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 866
346th ➔ 488th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 935 against 983.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
794th ➔ 773rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 965
- Team average: 1025 against 973.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 971
51st ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1086
- Team average: 1025 against 973.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1092
vs
Losers
781st ➔ 803rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Team average: 973 against 1025.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 963
726th ➔ 766th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 977
- Team average: 973 against 1025.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 971
Winners
944th ➔ 943rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 905
- Team average: 967 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 914
68th ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 967 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1038
vs
Winners
23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1149
- Team average: 1072 against 932.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1151
356th ➔ 346th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 1072 against 932.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 998
vs
Losers
731st ➔ 741st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 932 against 1072.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 974
910th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 888
- Team average: 932 against 1072.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 886
Winners
19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Team average: 1081 against 1003.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1088
21st ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1080
- Team average: 1081 against 1003.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1085
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 372nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1003 against 1081.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 995
122nd ➔ 139th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 1003 against 1081.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1002
Winners
774th ➔ 731st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Team average: 1024 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 976
55th ➔ 51st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1079
- Team average: 1024 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1086
vs
Losers
287th ➔ 356th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1003
- Team average: 992 against 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 996
692nd ➔ 742nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 981
- Team average: 992 against 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 974