← Home

Username

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,380 / 2,000 XP
620 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Gondor
RotWK
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
976
ELO
#801
0W 3L · 0%
RotWKEnnorath · 1 versus 1
975
ELO
#586
0W 4L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
900
ELO
#1675
0W 16L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NZT-
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
NZT-
0W 1L
0%
Mariio
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
NZT- & Username
0W 1L
0%
Mariio & Username
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
dragonez & Kyagara
0W 2L
0%
HaroonZ & Sera12345
0W 1L
0%
2 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 909
  • Opponent rating: 890.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 900
Men·1 versus 1·02:04:41·2026-10-22 20:08 UTC
LRotWKArchetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 915
  • Opponent rating: 978.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 909
Men·1 versus 1·00:21:51·2026-10-22 19:43 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 922
  • Opponent rating: 971.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 915
Men·1 versus 1·00:18:24·2026-10-22 19:20 UTC
LRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 929
  • Opponent rating: 964.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 922
Men·1 versus 1·00:15:24·2026-10-22 19:03 UTC
LRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 934
  • Opponent rating: 1006.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 929
Men·1 versus 1·00:11:56·2026-10-22 18:47 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Opponent rating: 1000.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 934
Men·1 versus 1·00:09:22·2026-10-22 18:35 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 941
  • Opponent rating: 1112.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 940
Men·1 versus 1·00:08:59·2026-10-22 18:24 UTC
LRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Opponent rating: 1026.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 941
Men·1 versus 1·00:08:15·2026-10-22 18:00 UTC
LRotWKMisty MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 956
  • Opponent rating: 880.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 946
Men·1 versus 1·00:23:27·2026-10-22 17:35 UTC
LRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Opponent rating: 998.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 956
Men·1 versus 1·00:20:12·2026-10-22 17:13 UTC