Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
780th ➔ 732nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 968
- Team average: 936 against 949.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 977
328th ➔ 212th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 936 against 949.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1010
939th ➔ 937th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 841
- Team average: 936 against 949.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 850
vs
Losers
521st ➔ 675th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 949 against 936.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 983
921st ➔ 925th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 895
- Team average: 949 against 936.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 886
818th ➔ 835th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 962
- Team average: 949 against 936.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 953
Winners
924th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 887
- Team average: 1167 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 888
14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1220
- Team average: 1167 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1221
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1394
- Team average: 1167 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1395
vs
Losers
494th ➔ 503rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 987 against 1167.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 992
843rd ➔ 845th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 987 against 1167.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 950
168th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1017
- Team average: 987 against 1167.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1016
Winners
482nd ➔ 328th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 969 against 941.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1001
820th ➔ 788th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 960
- Team average: 969 against 941.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 968
833rd ➔ 818th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 954
- Team average: 969 against 941.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 962
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 521st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 941 against 969.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
731st ➔ 780th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 941 against 969.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 968
937th ➔ 939th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 849
- Team average: 941 against 969.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 841
Winners
14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1219
- Team average: 1187 against 977.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1220
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1393
- Team average: 1187 against 977.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1394
841st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 1187 against 977.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 952
vs
Losers
731st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 977
- Team average: 977 against 1187.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 976
820th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Team average: 977 against 1187.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 960
464th ➔ 482nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 977 against 1187.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 993
Winners
14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1218
- Team average: 1190 against 979.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1219
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1392
- Team average: 1190 against 979.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1393
821st ➔ 820th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 960
- Team average: 1190 against 979.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 961
vs
Losers
464th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 979 against 1190.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 994
620th ➔ 634th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 987
- Team average: 979 against 1190.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 986
831st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 955
- Team average: 979 against 1190.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 954
Winners
vs
Losers
12th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1229
- Opponent rating: 1111.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1218
Winners
160th ➔ 128th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1018
- Team average: 1016 against 1089.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1028
347th ➔ 231st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 999
- Team average: 1016 against 1089.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1009
116th ➔ 95th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1031
- Team average: 1016 against 1089.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1041
vs
Losers
14th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1227
- Team average: 1089 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1217
928th ➔ 931st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 876
- Team average: 1089 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 866
26th ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1165
- Team average: 1089 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1155
Winners
15th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1222
- Team average: 1084 against 1008.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1227
929th ➔ 928th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 871
- Team average: 1084 against 1008.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 876
28th ➔ 26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1160
- Team average: 1084 against 1008.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1165
vs
Losers
109th ➔ 116th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1036
- Team average: 1008 against 1084.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1031
142nd ➔ 160th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1023
- Team average: 1008 against 1084.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1018
798th ➔ 820th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 965
- Team average: 1008 against 1084.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 960
Winners
15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1216
- Team average: 1078 against 1014.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1222
932nd ➔ 929th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 865
- Team average: 1078 against 1014.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 871
29th ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1154
- Team average: 1078 against 1014.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1160
vs
Losers
769th ➔ 798th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 1014 against 1078.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 965
93rd ➔ 109th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1042
- Team average: 1014 against 1078.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1036
124th ➔ 142nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 1014 against 1078.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1023
Winners
160th ➔ 124th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1019
- Team average: 1004 against 1088.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1029
115th ➔ 93rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1032
- Team average: 1004 against 1088.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1042
820th ➔ 769th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Team average: 1004 against 1088.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 971
vs
Losers
14th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1226
- Team average: 1088 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1216
928th ➔ 932nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 875
- Team average: 1088 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 865
27th ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1164
- Team average: 1088 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1154
Winners
837th ➔ 820th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 952
- Team average: 1035 against 1039.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 961
unranked ➔ 230th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1035 against 1039.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
29th ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1155
- Team average: 1035 against 1039.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1164
vs
Losers
12th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1235
- Team average: 1039 against 1035.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1226
923rd ➔ 928th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 884
- Team average: 1039 against 1035.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 875
unranked ➔ 564th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1039 against 1035.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
10th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1244
- Team average: 1188 against 1233.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1254
17th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1204
- Team average: 1188 against 1233.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1214
40th ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1117
- Team average: 1188 against 1233.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1127
vs
Losers
7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1321
- Team average: 1233 against 1188.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1311
100th ➔ 124th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1038
- Team average: 1233 against 1188.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1028
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1341
- Team average: 1233 against 1188.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1331
Winners
7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1316
- Team average: 1254 against 1167.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1321
44th ➔ 40th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1112
- Team average: 1254 against 1167.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1117
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1336
- Team average: 1254 against 1167.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1341
vs
Losers
9th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1249
- Team average: 1167 against 1254.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1244
17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1209
- Team average: 1167 against 1254.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1204
93rd ➔ 100th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1043
- Team average: 1167 against 1254.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1038
Winners
656th ➔ 640th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 985
- Team average: 1169 against 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 986
7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1315
- Team average: 1169 against 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1316
17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1208
- Team average: 1169 against 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1209
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 385th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1169.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 999
unranked ➔ 386th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1169.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 999
unranked ➔ 387th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1169.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 999
Winners
815th ➔ 781st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Team average: 1020 against 982.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 968
71st ➔ 67th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1068
- Team average: 1020 against 982.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1075
122nd ➔ 104th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1031
- Team average: 1020 against 982.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1038
vs
Losers
113th ➔ 128th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1034
- Team average: 982 against 1020.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1027
810th ➔ 826th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Team average: 982 against 1020.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 954
829th ➔ 851st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 953
- Team average: 982 against 1020.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 946
Winners
136th ➔ 122nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1064 against 1020.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1031
24th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1176
- Team average: 1064 against 1020.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1183
478th ➔ 325th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 1064 against 1020.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1001
vs
Losers
817th ➔ 829th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 960
- Team average: 1020 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 953
67th ➔ 71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1020 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1068
132nd ➔ 154th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Team average: 1020 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1019
Winners
7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1314
- Team average: 1176 against 934.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1315
17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1207
- Team average: 1176 against 934.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1208
229th ➔ 211th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1176 against 934.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1010
vs
Losers
518th ➔ 560th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 934 against 1176.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 990
928th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 860
- Team average: 934 against 1176.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 859
834th ➔ 837th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 952
- Team average: 934 against 1176.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 951
Winners
873rd ➔ 862nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 934
- Team average: 1031 against 988.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 941
33rd ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1141
- Team average: 1031 against 988.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1148
154th ➔ 132nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1019
- Team average: 1031 against 988.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1026
vs
Losers
781st ➔ 816th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 967
- Team average: 988 against 1031.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 960
788th ➔ 817th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 967
- Team average: 988 against 1031.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 960
118th ➔ 136th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1031
- Team average: 988 against 1031.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1024
Winners
6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1323
- Team average: 1147 against 961.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1324
44th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1111
- Team average: 1147 against 961.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1112
228th ➔ 210th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1147 against 961.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1010
vs
Losers
117th ➔ 118th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1032
- Team average: 961 against 1147.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1031
unranked ➔ 383rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 961 against 1147.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 999
929th ➔ 930th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 851
- Team average: 961 against 1147.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 850
Winners
7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1313
- Team average: 1175 against 938.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1314
17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1206
- Team average: 1175 against 938.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1207
246th ➔ 229th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1175 against 938.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1009
vs
Losers
927th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 861
- Team average: 938 against 1175.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 860
829th ➔ 833rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 953
- Team average: 938 against 1175.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 952
298th ➔ 308th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 938 against 1175.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1001
Winners
6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1322
- Team average: 1146 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1323
44th ➔ 43rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1110
- Team average: 1146 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1111
245th ➔ 228th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1146 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1009
vs
Losers
117th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 972 against 1146.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1032
114th ➔ 116th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 972 against 1146.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1032
929th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 852
- Team average: 972 against 1146.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 851
Winners
818th ➔ 787th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 960
- Team average: 1047 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 967
47th ➔ 41st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1108
- Team average: 1047 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1115
67th ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Team average: 1047 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1081
vs
Losers
739th ➔ 780th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 974
- Team average: 1013 against 1047.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 967
133rd ➔ 154th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Team average: 1013 against 1047.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1019
96th ➔ 111th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1041
- Team average: 1013 against 1047.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1034
Winners
7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1312
- Team average: 1174 against 948.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1313
17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1205
- Team average: 1174 against 948.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1206
247th ➔ 246th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 1174 against 948.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1008
vs
Losers
927th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 862
- Team average: 948 against 1174.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 861
827th ➔ 829th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 954
- Team average: 948 against 1174.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 953
125th ➔ 126th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 948 against 1174.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1028
Winners
35th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1132
- Team average: 1046 against 1040.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1141
669th ➔ 515th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 1046 against 1040.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 992
133rd ➔ 113th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1025
- Team average: 1046 against 1040.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1034
vs
Losers
438th ➔ 629th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 1040 against 1046.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 986
635th ➔ 714th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Team average: 1040 against 1046.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 977
34th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1139
- Team average: 1040 against 1046.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1130
Winners
809th ➔ 791st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Team average: 1018 against 944.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 966
51st ➔ 48th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1103
- Team average: 1018 against 944.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1108
587th ➔ 459th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 1018 against 944.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 995
vs
Losers
925th ➔ 927th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 867
- Team average: 944 against 1018.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 862
819th ➔ 827th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 959
- Team average: 944 against 1018.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 954
268th ➔ 309th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 944 against 1018.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1001
Winners
2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1410
- Team average: 1210 against 1073.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1412
19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1197
- Team average: 1210 against 1073.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1199
142nd ➔ 132nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1210 against 1073.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1026
vs
Losers
43rd ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1110
- Team average: 1073 against 1210.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1108
64th ➔ 67th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1076
- Team average: 1073 against 1210.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1074
110th ➔ 113th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1035
- Team average: 1073 against 1210.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1033
Winners
vs
Losers
629th ➔ 636th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Team average: 881 against 1029.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 985
935th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 777
- Team average: 881 against 1029.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 776
Winners
141st ➔ 116th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1002 against 1007.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1033
117th ➔ 96th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1032
- Team average: 1002 against 1007.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1041
839th ➔ 818th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 1002 against 1007.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 960
vs
Losers
113th ➔ 132nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1034
- Team average: 1007 against 1002.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1025
285th ➔ 438th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1004
- Team average: 1007 against 1002.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 995
670th ➔ 739th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 1007 against 1002.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 974
Winners
669th ➔ 587th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 984
- Team average: 1024 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 990
34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1133
- Team average: 1024 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1139
823rd ➔ 815th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 955
- Team average: 1024 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 961
vs
Losers
810th ➔ 822nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 962
- Team average: 972 against 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 956
587th ➔ 669th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 989
- Team average: 972 against 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 983
781st ➔ 809th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 967
- Team average: 972 against 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 961
Winners
935th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 776
- Team average: 1127 against 944.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 777
2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1409
- Team average: 1127 against 944.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1410
19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1196
- Team average: 1127 against 944.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1197
vs
Losers
285th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1005
- Team average: 944 against 1127.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1004
925th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 868
- Team average: 944 against 1127.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 867
816th ➔ 818th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 960
- Team average: 944 against 1127.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 959