← Home

Aimer32

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 525,190 / 40,000 XP
14,810 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
999
ELO
#334
4W 5L · 44%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
990
ELO
#327
1W 5L · 17%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
981
ELO
#370
0W 8L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
954
ELO
#858
69W 105L · 40%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Arnor
6W 0L, 100% over 6 games
LegioCZ
7W 7L
50%
Aragornnn.
6W 4L
60%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Aimer32 & Arnor & f0rnost
4W 0L
100%
Aimer32 & KingZiggy & Lord Ziggy
2W 1L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Beto & CHMAAN & sardor 1997
1W 4L
20%
Glaurungg & KingZiggy & Lord Ziggy
1W 3L
25%
67 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Team average: 1011 against 1005.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 954
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:25·2026-10-28 18:42 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Team average: 955 against 1075.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 963
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:08·2026-10-28 18:21 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Team average: 950 against 1001.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 966
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:47·2026-10-28 16:01 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 1028 against 981.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 972
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:42·2026-10-26 21:08 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 957
  • Team average: 1001 against 977.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 965
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:15·2026-10-26 20:44 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Team average: 1005 against 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 957
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:03·2026-10-26 20:26 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 884 against 999.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 966
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:17·2026-10-26 18:27 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Team average: 895 against 997.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 955
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:01·2026-10-26 18:08 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 952
  • Team average: 972 against 938.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 959
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:35:42·2026-10-26 16:58 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 961
  • Team average: 1030 against 1007.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 952
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:25·2026-10-25 16:44 UTC