← Home

cosbafThe White HandTwo Ages of the World

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 658,890 / 80,000 XP
21,110 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Mordor
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#277
#529
Season 2
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01
#277
Season 1
1,004 pts
7W / 6L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#570
#570
Season 2
990 pts
3W / 7L
2026-11-01
#653
Season 1
940 pts
3W / 11L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NeYo
7W 0L, 100% over 7 games
Sbaffo
248W 237L
51%
SirFaramir
29W 25L
54%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
cosbaf & Sbaffo
140W 102L
58%
cosbaf & Sbaffo & SirFaramir
25W 16L
61%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
abbos123 & MAGAA & YAHYO
3W 7L
30%
Betandplay & WuTal
5W 2L
71%
66 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in each of 2 seasons. The Turning of the Year · 7 Aug 2026 Two Ages of the World · 1 Nov 2026
Two Ages of the World
Level 2 of 2
1.6% of players
Play 500 ranked games. Ranger of the North · 7 Aug 2026 Captain of Gondor · 7 Aug 2026
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Play 500 games as Isengard.
The White Hand
only 76 players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 913 against 1091.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 990
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:17·2026-10-30 14:36 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 984
  • Team average: 972 against 938.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:35:42·2026-10-26 16:58 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Team average: 970 against 1040.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 984
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:34·2026-10-19 16:16 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Team average: 937 against 1029.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 974
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:58·2026-10-19 15:57 UTC
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 987
  • Team average: 1042 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 978
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:09·2026-10-19 15:35 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 977 against 1076.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 987
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:25:58·2026-10-19 15:03 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Team average: 1050 against 1164.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:35·2026-10-15 16:14 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1002
  • Team average: 968 against 991.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:48·2026-10-15 16:00 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1006
  • Team average: 976 against 1075.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1002
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:17·2026-10-13 21:40 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1016 against 954.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1006
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:17·2026-09-19 13:05 UTC