Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
18th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1068
- Team average: 1067 against 1068.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1077
133rd ➔ 71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1003
- Team average: 1067 against 1068.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1012
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1098
- Team average: 1067 against 1068.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1107
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1101
- Team average: 1067 against 1068.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1110
vs
Losers
106th ➔ 147th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1068 against 1067.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1000
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1251
- Team average: 1068 against 1067.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1242
27th ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1037
- Team average: 1068 against 1067.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1028
383rd ➔ 406th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 1068 against 1067.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 967
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1248
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1251
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1095
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1098
161st ➔ 133rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1003
20th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1065
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1068
vs
Losers
197th ➔ 257th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 991
133rd ➔ 161st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 999
395th ➔ 401st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 968
300th ➔ 322nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 987
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1244
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1248
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1091
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1095
187th ➔ 161st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1000
20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1065
vs
Losers
164th ➔ 197th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 994
123rd ➔ 133rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1002
386th ➔ 395th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 975
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 971
198th ➔ 300th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 990
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1240
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1244
13th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1087
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1091
241st ➔ 187th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 996
22nd ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1057
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1061
vs
Losers
140th ➔ 164th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 998
171st ➔ 198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 994
81st ➔ 123rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1006
376th ➔ 386th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 979
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 975
Winners
239th ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1002
311th ➔ 171st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 988
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 998
unranked ➔ 81st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1010
400th ➔ 376th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 979
vs
Losers
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1250
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1240
407th ➔ 418th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 963
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 953
138th ➔ 241st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 992
18th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1067
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1057
Winners
13th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1087
- Team average: 1108 against 983.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1090
50th ➔ 48th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1023
- Team average: 1108 against 983.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1026
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1247
- Team average: 1108 against 983.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1250
14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1108 against 983.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1081
vs
Losers
170th ➔ 196th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 983 against 1108.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 994
unranked ➔ 174th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 983 against 1108.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 997
332nd ➔ 352nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 985
- Team average: 983 against 1108.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 982
420th ➔ 421st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 983 against 1108.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 948
Winners
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1084
- Team average: 1105 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1087
50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Team average: 1105 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1023
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1244
- Team average: 1105 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1247
15th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1105 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1078
vs
Losers
186th ➔ 238th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 986 against 1105.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 992
270th ➔ 310th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 986 against 1105.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 988
407th ➔ 413th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 959
- Team average: 986 against 1105.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 956
153rd ➔ 170th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 986 against 1105.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 997
Winners
211th ➔ 161st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 1039 against 985.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1000
17th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1039 against 985.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1075
8th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1123
- Team average: 1039 against 985.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1129
392nd ➔ 376th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 972
- Team average: 1039 against 985.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 978
vs
Losers
181st ➔ 299th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 985 against 1039.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 990
239th ➔ 321st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 985 against 1039.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 987
408th ➔ 417th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 959
- Team average: 985 against 1039.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 953
191st ➔ 305th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 985 against 1039.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 989
Winners
404th ➔ 382nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 966
- Team average: 986 against 1014.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 976
408th ➔ 404th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 958
- Team average: 986 against 1014.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 968
47th ➔ 31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Team average: 986 against 1014.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1036
174th ➔ 124th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 986 against 1014.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1006
vs
Losers
396th ➔ 407th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Team average: 1014 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 959
14th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1077
- Team average: 1014 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1067
160th ➔ 307th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 999
- Team average: 1014 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 989
71st ➔ 133rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 1014 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1002
Winners
414th ➔ 404th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 957
- Team average: 1023 against 1016.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 966
9th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1115
- Team average: 1023 against 1016.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1124
57th ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1017
- Team average: 1023 against 1016.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1026
132nd ➔ 71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1003
- Team average: 1023 against 1016.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1012
vs
Losers
13th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1086
- Team average: 1016 against 1023.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1077
404th ➔ 408th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 967
- Team average: 1016 against 1023.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 958
116th ➔ 160th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1016 against 1023.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 999
125th ➔ 174th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1005
- Team average: 1016 against 1023.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 996
Winners
14th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1045 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1086
420th ➔ 414th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 1045 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 957
11th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1093
- Team average: 1045 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1101
20th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Team average: 1045 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1069
vs
Losers
392nd ➔ 405th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 1019 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 963
303rd ➔ 343rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1019 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 983
58th ➔ 81st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1017
- Team average: 1019 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1009
10th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1098
- Team average: 1019 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1090
Winners
18th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1026 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1078
420th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 940
- Team average: 1026 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 949
117th ➔ 58th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1026 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1017
11th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Team average: 1026 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1098
vs
Losers
364th ➔ 392nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 980
- Team average: 1038 against 1026.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 971
10th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1102
- Team average: 1038 against 1026.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1093
unranked ➔ 303rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1038 against 1026.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
17th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1070
- Team average: 1038 against 1026.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1061
Winners
169th ➔ 123rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1007
14th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1087
242nd ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1002
16th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1036 against 1054.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1084
vs
Losers
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1111
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1102
419th ➔ 420th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 940
13th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1069
12th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1079
- Team average: 1054 against 1036.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1070
Winners
310th ➔ 169th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 988
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 998
17th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1068
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1078
342nd ➔ 242nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 993
19th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1065
- Team average: 1026 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1075
vs
Losers
8th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1121
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1111
407th ➔ 419th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 959
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 949
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1088
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1078
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Team average: 1064 against 1026.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1079
Winners
10th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1113
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1121
419th ➔ 407th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 959
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1080
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1088
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1081
- Team average: 1056 against 1034.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1089
vs
Losers
173rd ➔ 310th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 988
14th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1076
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1068
259th ➔ 342nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 983
16th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1073
- Team average: 1034 against 1056.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1065
Winners
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1104
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1113
420th ➔ 419th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 942
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 951
17th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1080
15th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1072
- Team average: 1047 against 1043.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1081
vs
Losers
124th ➔ 173rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1005
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 996
12th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1085
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1076
148th ➔ 259th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
13th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1082
- Team average: 1043 against 1047.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1073
Winners
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1095
- Team average: 1038 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1104
423rd ➔ 420th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 933
- Team average: 1038 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 942
20th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Team average: 1038 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1071
19th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1063
- Team average: 1038 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1072
vs
Losers
67th ➔ 124th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1014
- Team average: 1052 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1005
11th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1094
- Team average: 1052 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1085
114th ➔ 148th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1052 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1000
12th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1091
- Team average: 1052 against 1038.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1082
Winners
17th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1079 against 1011.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1075
6th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1126
- Team average: 1079 against 1011.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1132
25th ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1039
- Team average: 1079 against 1011.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1045
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Team average: 1079 against 1011.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1089
vs
Losers
136th ➔ 175th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 1011 against 1079.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 996
14th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Team average: 1011 against 1079.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1065
72nd ➔ 125th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 1011 against 1079.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1006
406th ➔ 414th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 960
- Team average: 1011 against 1079.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 954
Winners
20th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1063
- Team average: 1073 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1069
31st ➔ 25th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 1073 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1039
13th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1077
- Team average: 1073 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1083
7th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1120
- Team average: 1073 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1126
vs
Losers
287th ➔ 332nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1016 against 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 985
unranked ➔ 225th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1016 against 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 994
176th ➔ 303rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 1016 against 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 990
14th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1077
- Team average: 1016 against 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1071
Winners
128th ➔ 67th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1004
- Team average: 1043 against 1075.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1014
130th ➔ 68th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1004
- Team average: 1043 against 1075.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1014
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1084
- Team average: 1043 against 1075.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1094
13th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1081
- Team average: 1043 against 1075.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1091
vs
Losers
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1105
- Team average: 1075 against 1043.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1095
24th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1051
- Team average: 1075 against 1043.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1041
15th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1072
- Team average: 1075 against 1043.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1062
14th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1073
- Team average: 1075 against 1043.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1063
Winners
19th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1067
- Team average: 1016 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1077
unranked ➔ 78th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1016 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1010
unranked ➔ 79th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1016 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1010
unranked ➔ 80th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1016 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1010
vs
Losers
14th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1073
- Team average: 1083 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1063
5th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1130
- Team average: 1083 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1120
25th ➔ 31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1043
- Team average: 1083 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1033
11th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1087
- Team average: 1083 against 1016.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1077
Winners
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1096
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1105
157th ➔ 110th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
20th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1063
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1072
13th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1087
vs
Losers
72nd ➔ 133rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1011
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1002
26th ➔ 32nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1042
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1033
11th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1093
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1084
12th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1090
- Team average: 1059 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1081
Clan war[HERO] vs [EVIL] · Game 2 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[HERO] 1042 → 1034 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1042
- Clan ratings: 1042 against 1054.
- Expected result: 48%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1034
32 × (0 - 0.48) × 0.5 = -8 · #2[EVIL] 1054 → 1062 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1054
- Clan ratings: 1054 against 1042.
- Expected result: 52%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1062
32 × (1 - 0.52) × 0.5 = +8 · #1Placement war, counts double: necromancer, AchillesThese players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
2nd ➔ 1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1142
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1152
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +108th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1039
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +1018th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 979
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 989
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +105th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1057
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1067
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +10vs
Losers
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1000
80 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -2013th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 999
40 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -101st ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1143
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1133
40 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -10How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 4 of 5.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 987
80 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -20Clan war[HERO] vs [EVIL] · Game 1 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[HERO] 1042 → 1034 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1042
- Clan ratings: 1042 against 1054.
- Expected result: 48%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1034
32 × (0 - 0.48) × 0.5 = -8 · #2[EVIL] 1054 → 1062 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1054
- Clan ratings: 1054 against 1042.
- Expected result: 52%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1062
32 × (1 - 0.52) × 0.5 = +8 · #1Placement war, counts double: necromancer, AchillesThese players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
2nd ➔ 1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1142
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1152
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +108th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1039
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +1018th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 979
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 989
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +105th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1057
- Side average: 1052 against 1045.
- Expected result: 51%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1067
40 × (1 - 0.51) × 0.5 = +10vs
Losers
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1000
80 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -2013th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 999
40 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -101st ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1143
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1133
40 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -10How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Side average: 1045 against 1052.
- Expected result: 49%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 4 of 5.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 987
80 × (0 - 0.49) × 0.5 = -20Winners
419th ➔ 418th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 926
- Team average: 970 against 1003.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 936
118th ➔ 57th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 970 against 1003.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1017
239th ➔ 132nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 970 against 1003.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1003
409th ➔ 400th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 957
- Team average: 970 against 1003.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 967
vs
Losers
16th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1073
- Team average: 1003 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1063
415th ➔ 419th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 943
- Team average: 1003 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 933
339th ➔ 386th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 1003 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 973
65th ➔ 121st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1015
- Team average: 1003 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1005
Winners
20th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1065
- Team average: 1001 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1073
415th ➔ 409th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 1001 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 957
121st ➔ 65th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 1001 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1015
329th ➔ 239th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 985
- Team average: 1001 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 993
vs
Losers
411th ➔ 415th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 951
- Team average: 972 against 1001.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 943
65th ➔ 118th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1015
- Team average: 972 against 1001.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1007
256th ➔ 339th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 972 against 1001.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 983
419th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 934
- Team average: 972 against 1001.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 926
Winners
22nd ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1058
- Team average: 1002 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1065
115th ➔ 65th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1002 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1015
416th ➔ 415th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 942
- Team average: 1002 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 949
145th ➔ 121st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1002 against 972.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1007
vs
Losers
405th ➔ 411th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 958
- Team average: 972 against 1002.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 951
162nd ➔ 256th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 972 against 1002.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 991
417th ➔ 419th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 941
- Team average: 972 against 1002.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 934
247th ➔ 329th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 972 against 1002.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 985
Clan war[HERO] vs [EVIL] · Game 2 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[HERO] 1028 → 1021 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1028
- Clan ratings: 1028 against 1057.
- Expected result: 46%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1021
32 × (0 - 0.46) × 0.5 = -7 · #2[EVIL] 1057 → 1064 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1057
- Clan ratings: 1057 against 1028.
- Expected result: 54%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1064
32 × (1 - 0.54) × 0.5 = +7 · #1These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
2nd ➔ 1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1134
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1143
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +93rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1099
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1108
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +96th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1048
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1057
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +98th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1029
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +9vs
Losers
5th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1051
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1042
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -91st ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1145
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1136
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -99th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1018
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1009
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -913th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1001
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -9Clan war[HERO] vs [EVIL] · Game 1 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[HERO] 1028 → 1021 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1028
- Clan ratings: 1028 against 1057.
- Expected result: 46%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1021
32 × (0 - 0.46) × 0.5 = -7 · #2[EVIL] 1057 → 1064 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1057
- Clan ratings: 1057 against 1028.
- Expected result: 54%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1064
32 × (1 - 0.54) × 0.5 = +7 · #1These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
2nd ➔ 1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1134
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1143
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +93rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1099
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1108
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +96th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1048
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1057
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +98th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Side average: 1075 against 1056.
- Expected result: 53%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1029
40 × (1 - 0.53) × 0.5 = +9vs
Losers
5th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1051
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1042
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -91st ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1145
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1136
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -99th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1018
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1009
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -913th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Side average: 1056 against 1075.
- Expected result: 47%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1001
40 × (0 - 0.47) × 0.5 = -9Clan war[HERO] vs [EVIL] · Game 2 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[HERO] 1044 → 1036 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1044
- Clan ratings: 1044 against 1041.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1036
32 × (0 - 0.50) × 0.5 = -8 · #1 → #2[EVIL] 1041 → 1049 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1041
- Clan ratings: 1041 against 1044.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1049
32 × (1 - 0.50) × 0.5 = +8 · #2 → #1These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1124
- Side average: 1065 against 1066.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1134
40 × (1 - 0.50) × 0.5 = +103rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Side average: 1065 against 1066.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1099
40 × (1 - 0.50) × 0.5 = +106th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1038
- Side average: 1065 against 1066.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1048
40 × (1 - 0.50) × 0.5 = +1013th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Side average: 1065 against 1066.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1020
40 × (1 - 0.50) × 0.5 = +10vs
Losers
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Side average: 1066 against 1065.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1051
40 × (0 - 0.50) × 0.5 = -101st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1155
- Side average: 1066 against 1065.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1145
40 × (0 - 0.50) × 0.5 = -108th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1028
- Side average: 1066 against 1065.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1018
40 × (0 - 0.50) × 0.5 = -109th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Side average: 1066 against 1065.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1010
40 × (0 - 0.50) × 0.5 = -10










