Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
800th ➔ 739th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 966
- Team average: 970 against 1000.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 976
754th ➔ 662nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 974
- Team average: 970 against 1000.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 984
vs
Losers
314th ➔ 558th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 990
unranked ➔ 595th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 990
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1293
- Team average: 1188 against 1157.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1300
56th ➔ 52nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Team average: 1188 against 1157.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1090
vs
Losers
92nd ➔ 111th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1045
- Team average: 1157 against 1188.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1038
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1269
- Team average: 1157 against 1188.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1262
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1269
- Opponent rating: 1071.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1270
vs
Losers
88th ➔ 90th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Opponent rating: 1269.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1070
Winners
74th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Opponent rating: 967.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1081
vs
Losers
1026th ➔ 1036th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 967
- Opponent rating: 1078.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 964
Winners
299th ➔ 183rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 982 against 1015.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1011
805th ➔ 754th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Team average: 982 against 1015.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 974
vs
Losers
184th ➔ 314th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 1015 against 982.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1000
147th ➔ 184th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Team average: 1015 against 982.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1010
Winners
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1201
- Opponent rating: 1081.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1204
vs
Losers
73rd ➔ 74th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1081
- Opponent rating: 1201.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1078
Winners
51st ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1096
- Team average: 1045 against 953.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1100
140th ➔ 131st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1025
- Team average: 1045 against 953.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1029
181st ➔ 164th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1015
- Team average: 1045 against 953.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1019
vs
Losers
876th ➔ 885th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 953 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 945
962nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 860
- Team average: 953 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 856
84th ➔ 89th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1052
- Team average: 953 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1048
Winners
450th ➔ 271st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 954 against 1007.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1006
890th ➔ 867th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 942
- Team average: 954 against 1007.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 952
917th ➔ 903rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 925
- Team average: 954 against 1007.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 935
vs
Losers
83rd ➔ 99th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1052
- Team average: 1007 against 954.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1042
515th ➔ 696th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1007 against 954.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 982
750th ➔ 808th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 977
- Team average: 1007 against 954.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 967
Winners
30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1132
- Team average: 1069 against 915.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1133
249th ➔ 234th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 1069 against 915.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1008
vs
Losers
806th ➔ 810th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Team average: 915 against 1069.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 963
922nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 866
- Team average: 915 against 1069.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 865
Winners
78th ➔ 76th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1059
- Team average: 1040 against 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1064
262nd ➔ 200th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 1040 against 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1012
80th ➔ 77th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1056
- Team average: 1040 against 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1061
vs
Losers
663rd ➔ 721st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 985
- Team average: 969 against 1040.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 980
477th ➔ 611th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 969 against 1040.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 989
912th ➔ 920th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 929
- Team average: 969 against 1040.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 924
Winners
28th ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1150
- Opponent rating: 1076.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1155
vs
Losers
80th ➔ 88th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1076
- Opponent rating: 1150.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1071
Winners
63rd ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1091
- Opponent rating: 1045.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1098
vs
Losers
135th ➔ 146th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1045
- Opponent rating: 1091.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1038
Winners
629th ➔ 354th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 989
- Team average: 923 against 1021.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 1000
881st ➔ 854th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 946
- Team average: 923 against 1021.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 957
967th ➔ 963rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 835
- Team average: 923 against 1021.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 846
vs
Losers
119th ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1036
- Team average: 1021 against 923.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1025
591st ➔ 726th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 1021 against 923.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 979
109th ➔ 134th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1038
- Team average: 1021 against 923.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1027
Winners
895th ➔ 874th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 940
- Team average: 944 against 938.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 949
962nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 851
- Team average: 944 against 938.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 860
99th ➔ 85th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1043
- Team average: 944 against 938.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1052
vs
Losers
957th ➔ 961st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 874
- Team average: 938 against 944.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 865
712th ➔ 775th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 938 against 944.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 973
852nd ➔ 867th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 959
- Team average: 938 against 944.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 950
Winners
220th ➔ 182nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1016
- Opponent rating: 961.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1022
vs
Losers
1047th ➔ 1072nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Opponent rating: 1016.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 955
Winners
28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1149
- Opponent rating: 968.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1150
vs
Losers
1005th ➔ 1017th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 968
- Opponent rating: 1149.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 967
Winners
910th ➔ 894th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 930
- Team average: 934 against 974.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 940
961st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 841
- Team average: 934 against 974.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 851
123rd ➔ 99th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 934 against 974.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1043
vs
Losers
893rd ➔ 911th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 939
- Team average: 974 against 934.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 929
694th ➔ 774th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 974 against 934.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 973
unranked ➔ 611th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 974 against 934.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 990
Winners
116th ➔ 105th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1053
- Opponent rating: 1011.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1060
vs
Losers
242nd ➔ 332nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1011
- Opponent rating: 1053.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1004
Winners
81st ➔ 78th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1052
- Team average: 1033 against 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1059
unranked ➔ 262nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1033 against 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1007
88th ➔ 80th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1049
- Team average: 1033 against 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1056
vs
Losers
775th ➔ 815th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Team average: 1000 against 1033.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 966
117th ➔ 128th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1037
- Team average: 1000 against 1033.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1030
515th ➔ 664th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1000 against 1033.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 985
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1394
- Team average: 1203 against 863.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1395
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1258
- Team average: 1203 against 863.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1259
850th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 958
- Team average: 1203 against 863.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 959
vs
Losers
952nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 880
- Team average: 863 against 1203.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 879
955th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 875
- Team average: 863 against 1203.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 874
965th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 836
- Team average: 863 against 1203.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 835
Winners
62nd ➔ 52nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1091
- Opponent rating: 1159.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1101
vs
Losers
23rd ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1159
- Opponent rating: 1091.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1149
Winners
138th ➔ 119th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Team average: 987 against 987.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1036
775th ➔ 712th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Team average: 987 against 987.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 982
834th ➔ 788th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 963
- Team average: 987 against 987.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 972
vs
Losers
271st ➔ 414th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 987 against 987.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 997
333rd ➔ 515th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 987 against 987.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 992
857th ➔ 880th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 955
- Team average: 987 against 987.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 946
Winners
70th ➔ 63rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Opponent rating: 1061.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1091
vs
Losers
102nd ➔ 116th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Opponent rating: 1083.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1053
Winners
999th ➔ 934th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Opponent rating: 999.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 979
vs
Losers
399th ➔ 768th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 999
- Opponent rating: 969.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 989
Winners
unranked ➔ 43rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Free for all, rated against 1030. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 176th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Free for all, rated against 1000. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 998
6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1126
- Free for all, rated against 1000. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1123
unranked ➔ 177th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Free for all, rated against 1000. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 998
243rd ➔ 268th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Free for all, rated against 1000. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 994
Reported for teaming
Winners
38th ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1114
- Team average: 1057 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1121
unranked ➔ 250th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1057 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1007
vs
Losers
828th ➔ 855th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 958
- Team average: 1013 against 1057.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 951
66th ➔ 68th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1013 against 1057.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1062
Winners
953rd ➔ 952nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 879
- Team average: 1176 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 880
3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1393
- Team average: 1176 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1394
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1257
- Team average: 1176 against 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1258
vs
Losers
81st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1053
- Team average: 1019 against 1176.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1052
87th ➔ 88th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1050
- Team average: 1019 against 1176.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1049
853rd ➔ 855th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 956
- Team average: 1019 against 1176.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 955
Winners
297th ➔ 249th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 991 against 917.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1007
697th ➔ 633rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 981
- Team average: 991 against 917.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 986
vs
Losers
633rd ➔ 697th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Team average: 917 against 991.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 981
925th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 849
- Team average: 917 against 991.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 844
Winners
153rd ➔ 138th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1021
- Team average: 1001 against 950.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1027
unranked ➔ 270th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1001 against 950.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1006
694th ➔ 628th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 1001 against 950.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 989
vs
Losers
950th ➔ 955th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 881
- Team average: 950 against 1001.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 875
414th ➔ 515th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 950 against 1001.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 992
782nd ➔ 814th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 972
- Team average: 950 against 1001.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 966
Winners
83rd ➔ 70th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Opponent rating: 1070.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1083
vs
Losers
91st ➔ 102nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1070
- Opponent rating: 1074.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1061