← HomeLEVEL
Level 22,980 / 5,000 XP
2,020 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
11W 5L · 69%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1W 3L · 25%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
2W 5L · 29%
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TheBigMelo
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
ALEXILDURR & Angros & Spartaco Gamer
2W 1L
67%
ALEXILDURR & Hasbulla M & Spartaco Gamer
0W 3L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
BananenBro & Dregal & FladenBro
0W 3L
0%
daboo & imabussin
1W 0L
100%
21 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players

WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1021
- Opponent rating: 1152.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 1032
Elves·1 versus 1·00:21:59·2026-10-22 19:59 UTC
WRotWKArchetHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1014
- Opponent rating: 982.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1021
Elves·1 versus 1·00:12:01·2026-10-22 19:06 UTC
WRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1005
- Opponent rating: 1024.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1014
Elves·1 versus 1·00:21:04·2026-10-21 20:22 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 996
- Opponent rating: 989.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1005
Elves·1 versus 1·00:12:20·2026-10-21 20:00 UTC
LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Opponent rating: 1095.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 996
Elves·1 versus 1·00:25:56·2026-10-21 19:10 UTC
WRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1006
- Opponent rating: 908.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1010
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:22·2026-09-23 15:28 UTC
WRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1006
- Opponent rating: 1075.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1016
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:01:51·2026-09-10 22:19 UTC
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1012
- Opponent rating: 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1006
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:41·2026-09-04 16:47 UTC
LRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1014
- Opponent rating: 1145.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1012
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:04:20·2026-09-04 16:33 UTC
WRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1010
- Opponent rating: 913.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1014
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:58·2026-09-04 16:19 UTC