← Home

Aimer32

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 525,350 / 40,000 XP
14,650 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#338
#338
Season 2
999 pts
4W / 5L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#848
#848
Season 2
962 pts
70W / 106L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#327
#327
Season 2
990 pts
1W / 5L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
FFA · BFME1
BEST
#374
#374
Season 2
981 pts
0W / 8L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Arnor
6W 0L, 100% over 6 games
LegioCZ
7W 7L
50%
Aragorn.
6W 4L
60%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Aimer32 & Arnor & f0rnost
4W 0L
100%
Aimer32 & KingZiggy & Lord Ziggy
2W 1L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Beto & chaman11 & CHMAAN
1W 4L
20%
Glaurungg & KingZiggy & Lord Ziggy
1W 3L
25%
67 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players
Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1The Shire NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 952
  • Team average: 935 against 981.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 962
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:35·2026-10-31 11:59 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 954
  • Team average: 981 against 1108.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 952
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:20·2026-10-30 21:14 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Team average: 1011 against 1005.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 954
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:25·2026-10-28 18:42 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Team average: 955 against 1075.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 963
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:08·2026-10-28 18:21 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Team average: 950 against 1001.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 966
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:47·2026-10-28 16:01 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 1028 against 981.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 972
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:42·2026-10-26 21:08 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 957
  • Team average: 1001 against 977.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 965
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:15·2026-10-26 20:44 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Team average: 1005 against 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 957
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:03·2026-10-26 20:26 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 884 against 999.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 966
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:17·2026-10-26 18:27 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Team average: 895 against 997.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 955
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:01·2026-10-26 18:08 UTC