← Home

Akro

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 36,120 / 10,000 XP
3,880 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
1038
ELO
#28
8W 3L · 73%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
990
ELO
#572
13W 13L · 50%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#106
#106
Season 1
1,026 pts
3W / 0L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#136
#136
Season 1
1,000 pts
4W / 4L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
FFA · BFME1
BEST
#148
#148
Season 1
995 pts
0W / 2L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Suhrob
6W 1L, 86% over 7 games
nodir1
14W 7L
67%
BoNYa
11W 8L
58%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Akro & BuNGuN.481 & ZerO0918
3W 4L
43%
Akro & Bonya_Axmed & Suhrob
4W 1L
80%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Aragornn & TwoConcept & XaYaBi
2W 0L
100%
King_Elessar & noob777 & the oddyssy
0W 2L
0%
58 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Fields of Edhellond NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:28:18·2026-09-12 18:34 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 996
  • Team average: 1037 against 1092.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 990
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:51·2026-09-12 17:58 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Team average: 1044 against 1085.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 996
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:41·2026-09-12 17:44 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1013
  • Team average: 1033 against 981.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1003
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:42·2026-09-10 18:35 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1023
  • Team average: 1074 against 1036.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1013
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:34·2026-09-10 18:09 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Team average: 1104 against 1011.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -11.
  • Rating after: 1023
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:46·2026-09-10 17:58 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:12:07·2026-09-07 19:36 UTC
WBFME1Pelennor Fields NmHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:09:36·2026-09-07 19:06 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:10:50·2026-09-07 18:51 UTC
WBFME1Dagorlad NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:08:24·2026-09-07 18:34 UTC