← Home

Alamaki

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 414,120 / 20,000 XP
5,880 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Mordor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1028
ELO
#132
4W 0L · 100%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
993
ELO
#432
0W 2L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#379
#379
Season 1
997 pts
1W / 1L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#696
#696
Season 1
977 pts
3W / 8L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Lord Ziggy
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Schwoam
4W 6L
40%
SewyMoP0Ga
2W 4L
33%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Alamaki & Schwoam
4W 6L
40%
Alamaki & SewyMoP0Ga
2W 4L
33%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
new player. & SewyMoP0Ga
2W 0L
100%
Atemk & pullakissa
2W 0L
100%
58 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1022
  • Team average: 1116 against 1048.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1028
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:11·2026-10-17 19:17 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1013
  • Team average: 985 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1022
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:32:47·2026-09-09 16:47 UTC
LBFME1Wold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Team average: 979 against 1150.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 993
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:13:14·2026-09-06 13:19 UTC
LBFME1Wold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 993 against 1050.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:21:07·2026-09-05 15:32 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 1039 against 977.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1013
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:03:10·2026-09-05 09:44 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1032 against 999.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1007
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:13·2026-09-05 09:30 UTC
WBFME1EastfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:14:39·2026-06-29 18:42 UTC
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:39:20·2026-06-20 07:20 UTC
LBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:16:02·2026-06-11 17:07 UTC
LBFME1Pelargir 2.22How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:15:37·2026-05-30 08:36 UTC