← HomeLEVEL
Level 417,660 / 20,000 XP
2,340 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
64W 48L · 57%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
2W 1L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1W 4L · 20%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#252
Season 1
1,000 pts
9W / 3L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Spartaco Gamer
2W 1L, 67% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Angros & TheBigMelo
1W 3L
25%
ALEXILDURR & Angros & Spartaco Gamer
2W 1L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Oddy Nuff & wowowowow
1W 0L
100%
BananenBro & FladenBro & RohanRider
1W 0L
100%
8 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Elf-friend
Level 1 of 3
only 174 players
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.3% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players
SAVED REPLAYS
2
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1064
- Opponent rating: 1039.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1072
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:10:11·2026-11-03 23:05 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1070
- Opponent rating: 1124.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1064
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:15:58·2026-11-03 22:47 UTC
LRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1075
- Opponent rating: 1154.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1070
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:19:54·2026-11-02 00:49 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1081
- Opponent rating: 1148.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1075
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:31:11·2026-11-02 00:07 UTC
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1078
- Opponent rating: 962.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1081
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:25:19·2026-11-01 23:33 UTC
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1088
- Opponent rating: 1019.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1078
Men·1 versus 1·00:27:25·2026-11-01 22:59 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1083
- Opponent rating: 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1088
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:39·2026-11-01 22:47 UTC
LRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1092
- Opponent rating: 1092.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1083
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:10:29·2026-11-01 22:31 UTC
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1096
- Opponent rating: 1035.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1102
Men·1 versus 1·00:17:06·2026-10-19 21:06 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1088
- Opponent rating: 1076.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1096
Men·1 versus 1·00:18:30·2026-10-19 20:45 UTC