← HomeLEVEL
Level 411,310 / 20,000 XP
8,690 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
4W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
0W 2L · 0%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#100
Season 1
1,051 pts
20W / 6L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Talos_god
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Atreides & Talos_god
2W 0L
100%
Atreides & TheKing
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Empyy & OHTAKEOVER
1W 0L
100%
OHTAKEOVER & Schere
1W 0L
100%
19 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Called to the Lists
Level 1 of 2
1.7% of players
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.3% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.7% of players
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 997
- Opponent rating: 1034.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 990
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:31:13·2026-06-06 17:36 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Opponent rating: 1112.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 997
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:20·2026-06-04 14:29 UTC 
LRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:28:07·2026-04-25 12:21 UTC 
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:46:39·2026-04-25 11:08 UTC 
LRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·1 versus 1·00:26:59·2026-04-22 16:05 UTC 
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:20:52·2026-04-22 15:41 UTC
WRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:06:35·2026-04-22 15:31 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·1 versus 1·00:19:12·2026-04-22 15:08 UTC 
WRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:17:39·2026-04-22 14:48 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:05:42·2026-04-19 08:26 UTC
