← Home

BELARUS

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 413,640 / 20,000 XP
6,360 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1003
ELO
#146
5W 1L · 83%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#176
#176
Season 1
1,008 pts
7W / 0L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Schere
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Schere
1W 0L
100%
Belisarius
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
BELARUS & Schere
1W 0L
100%
BELARUS & Belisarius
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Baikal & Builder
1W 0L
100%
Supr1m & UnRo
1W 0L
100%
12 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.3% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:09:24·2026-05-03 07:03 UTC
WRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:39·2026-05-01 17:20 UTC
WRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:20:18·2026-04-30 17:10 UTC
WRotWKFirien ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1025
  • Team average: 1011 against 986.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1033
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:11:48·2026-04-28 17:31 UTC
WRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1052 against 1013.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1025
Men·2 versus 2·00:10:19·2026-04-27 18:14 UTC
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:40·2026-04-26 15:57 UTC
WRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:11:07·2026-04-26 14:36 UTC
WRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:17:04·2026-04-26 14:14 UTC
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:11:12·2026-04-26 11:52 UTC
LRotWKWoodmen TownHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1027
  • Team average: 1013 against 1007.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1018
Men·2 versus 2·00:17:59·2026-04-25 17:55 UTC