← Home

BOMBYDIL

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 39,260 / 10,000 XP
740 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Show all 8
Gondor
BFME1
Goblins
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
974
ELO
#936
1W 4L · 20%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TYTY
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
TYTY
1W 0L
100%
The Chad
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
BOMBYDIL & TYTY
1W 0L
100%
BOMBYDIL & The Chad
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Ahiles & IsinGod
1W 0L
100%
jioso & Kobosil
0W 1L
0%
9 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Have 25 friends.
The Fellowship
Level 1 of 2
3.1% of players
LRotWKEmerald IsletHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves1 versus 100:11:072025-10-04 04:33 UTC
vs indica
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men1 versus 100:13:062025-10-04 04:05 UTC
vs indica
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:08:352025-10-04 03:51 UTC
vs indica
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:14:242025-10-03 17:31 UTC
vs Kili_
LRotWKEmerald IsletHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:20:022025-10-03 17:09 UTC
vs CROAT
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:18:152025-10-03 15:17 UTC
WRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:16:482025-10-03 14:57 UTC
vs Bosmer
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:07:452025-10-03 14:35 UTC
vs N00oob
LRotWKFar HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Team average: 996 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 983
Elves2 versus 200:11:012025-10-03 14:24 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:10:152025-10-03 14:05 UTC