← Home
Belisarius
📍 Ukraine
LEVEL
Level 8161,510 / 200,000 XP
38,490 XP to level 9
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
183W 57L · 76%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
48W 24L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1W 2L · 33%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#12
Season 1
1,269 pts
226W / 102L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Matty
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Belisarius & Supr1m
10W 6L
62%
Belisarius & JLS.
5W 3L
62%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Felipemito & Makaa
3W 1L
75%
61 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
Loremaster
only 114 players
Doom of Sauron
Level 3 of 3
only 78 players
Flame of Anor
Level 2 of 3
1.6% of players
Lord of the Mark
Level 3 of 4
1.2% of players
Many Tongues
Level 1 of 2
only 148 players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Race of Men
only 42 players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
The Witch-realm
only 18 players
Warden of Patch 2.02
only 55 players
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1329
- Opponent rating: 1382.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1323
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:22:04·2026-10-04 15:56 UTC
LRotWKLanthir LamathHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·4 versus 4·00:17:23·2026-10-03 20:09 UTC
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1318
- Opponent rating: 1301.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1309
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:17·2026-09-16 18:57 UTC 
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1280
- Opponent rating: 1407.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1277
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:34:17·2026-09-15 16:29 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1272
- Opponent rating: 1214.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1262
Elves·1 versus 1·00:22:18·2026-09-12 14:13 UTC
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1230
- Opponent rating: 1257.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1222
Elves·1 versus 1·00:58:53·2026-09-12 10:00 UTC 
LRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1233
- Opponent rating: 1279.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1226
Elves·1 versus 1·00:14:36·2026-09-12 09:38 UTC 
LRotWKAnorienHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·2 versus 2·00:25:16·2026-07-27 20:47 UTC 
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1223
- Opponent rating: 1239.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1215
Elves·1 versus 1·00:16:30·2026-07-23 22:22 UTC 
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1232
- Opponent rating: 1230.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1223
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:12:07·2026-07-23 22:08 UTC
