← Home

Bum-Bao

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1510 / 2,000 XP
1,490 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKEnnorath · 1 versus 1
957
ELO
#678
1W 7L · 12%

LAST 5 SEASONS

No finished seasons on this patch yet.

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Ed123
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Ed123
0W 1L
0%
Excelsior
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Bum-Bao & Ed123
0W 1L
0%
Bum-Bao & DrThrax & Excelsior & Gurte
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
BaneDurin & FN123
0W 1L
0%
Honezt & JLS. & Matty & Zhako
0W 1L
0%
2 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKRiver NimrodelHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 696
  • Opponent rating: 992.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 695
Men·1 versus 1·00:23:50·2026-07-22 17:08 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 697
  • Opponent rating: 991.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 696
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:02·2026-07-22 16:46 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 704
  • Opponent rating: 738.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 697
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:21:25·2026-07-22 16:23 UTC
LRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 705
  • Opponent rating: 983.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 704
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:04·2026-07-22 15:56 UTC
WRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 692
  • Opponent rating: 975.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +13.
  • Rating after: 705
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:03:37·2026-07-22 07:40 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 693
  • Opponent rating: 974.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 692
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:19·2026-07-22 07:22 UTC
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 697
  • Opponent rating: 794.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 693
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:43:33·2026-07-21 23:07 UTC
LRotWKNorth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 705
  • Opponent rating: 732.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 697
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:47·2026-07-21 16:23 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 706
  • Opponent rating: 1003.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 705
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:11:48·2026-07-21 14:11 UTC
vs Aear
LRotWKThe CrossroadsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 992 against 991.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:13:33·2026-07-20 22:56 UTC