← HomeFang250
📍 United States
LEVEL
Level 7117,970 / 130,000 XP
12,030 XP to level 8
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
123W 133L · 48%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
11W 17L · 39%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#160
Season 1
1,018 pts
44W / 41L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
P B R
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Fang250 & wowowowow
3W 3L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Felipemito & Makaa
3W 6L
33%
DonPepita & Hunter...
2W 3L
40%
64 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Bane of the Enemy
Level 2 of 3
1.3% of players
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
Lord of the Mark
Level 3 of 4
1.2% of players
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
The White Hand
only 75 players
Warden of Patch 2.02
only 55 players
LRotWKArchetHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1004
- Opponent rating: 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 999
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:18:00·2026-10-16 02:19 UTC
WRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:10:54·2026-10-12 19:48 UTC 
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1013
- Opponent rating: 1017.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1004
Isengard·1 versus 1·01:02:59·2026-10-10 22:12 UTC 
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1009
- Opponent rating: 921.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1013
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:40·2026-10-10 21:44 UTC 
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1018
- Opponent rating: 1025.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1009
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:27:00·2026-10-10 20:56 UTC 
LRotWKPlains of RohanHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:05:13·2026-10-10 20:49 UTC 
WRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:20:05·2026-10-08 00:45 UTC 
LRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1022
- Opponent rating: 1122.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1018
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:29·2026-10-08 00:29 UTC 
WRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1021
- Opponent rating: 829.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1022
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:21·2026-10-07 02:52 UTC 
WRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1017
- Opponent rating: 928.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1021
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:26:59·2026-10-06 23:07 UTC
