← HomeLEVEL
Level 412,970 / 20,000 XP
7,030 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 11
LAST 5 SEASONS
Ennorath
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#36
Season 1
1,076 pts
26W / 23L
2026-10-28
Ennorath
2 versus 2 · RotWK
#108
Season 1
985 pts
0W / 2L
2026-10-28
Ennorath
3 versus 3 · RotWK
#18
Season 1
1,000 pts
1W / 0L
2026-10-28
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
PTU_Lezyok
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
BurMister & Enoratovet & PTU_Lezyok
1W 0L
100%
BurMister & Priziv & Zira_aa
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
fatcat & Lev_05 & _Melkor_
1W 0L
100%
DickObraz & Ooops & PTU.Rak
1W 0L
100%
50 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1077
- Opponent rating: 1302.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1076
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:18:38·2026-10-23 19:17 UTC
LRotWKFord of BruinenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1086
- Opponent rating: 1072.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1077
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:32:40·2026-10-23 18:38 UTC
LRotWKLossarnach IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1060
- Opponent rating: 1103.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1053
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:04:23·2026-10-12 17:31 UTC
LRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1058
- Opponent rating: 1104.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1051
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:14:34·2026-10-11 14:59 UTC
LRotWKFirien daleHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1054
- Opponent rating: 1337.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1053
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:39·2026-10-05 16:43 UTC
LRotWKFords of Isen (Unlame)How this was worked out- Rating before: 1022
- Opponent rating: 1054.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1015
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:37:01·2026-10-05 12:58 UTC
LRotWKWestfold IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1010
- Opponent rating: 1081.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1005
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:18:20·2026-10-03 20:44 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fells*How this was worked out- Rating before: 982
- Opponent rating: 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 978
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:05:08·2026-08-16 13:40 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 987
- Opponent rating: 1068.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 982
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:16·2026-08-16 13:25 UTC
LRotWKRhudaurHow this was worked out- Rating before: 981
- Opponent rating: 1061.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 976
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:21·2026-08-16 10:57 UTC