← Home

C4m3leon

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 23,210 / 5,000 XP
1,790 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#360
1W 0L · 100%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#259
#259
Season 1
1,000 pts
6W / 5L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Gammaction
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
LB off
0W 3L
0%
TONYMORGAN
1W 1L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
AK-47 & C4m3leon & LB off
0W 2L
0%
C4m3leon & Gammaction & TONYMORGAN
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Baranor. & Loken & _Gimli_
1W 3L
25%
3 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKRiver NimrodelHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 968.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:25·2026-05-20 17:04 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:24:31·2026-05-11 18:23 UTC
WRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:28·2026-05-07 14:33 UTC
WRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:14·2026-04-22 19:06 UTC
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:00:16·2026-03-24 17:05 UTC
WRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:43·2026-02-26 16:47 UTC
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:53·2026-02-26 16:31 UTC
LRotWKEmerald IsletHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:24:01·2026-02-26 16:03 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:19:23·2026-02-26 15:39 UTC
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:04:31·2026-02-20 17:15 UTC