← Home

Caprah

📍 Italy🎬 Caprqq
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1960 / 2,000 XP
1,040 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
1018
ELO
#189
2W 0L · 100%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1007
ELO
#251
1W 0L · 100%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#685
#685
Season 1
979 pts
0W / 4L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#628
#628
Season 1
960 pts
0W / 7L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
VALVERDE8
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
RisingSun
1W 1L
50%
kingsman
0W 2L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Caprah & RisingSun & VALVERDE8
1W 0L
100%
Caprah & ManOnEdge
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
bilol & dadakosi5 & LITTO
1W 0L
100%
David_Ger & Gorthaurr
0W 1L
0%
35 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Opponent rating: 1001.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1018
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:21:00·2026-08-20 17:22 UTC
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:11:51·2026-08-20 17:07 UTC
WBFME1The Shire NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1006 against 963.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:07·2026-08-13 13:40 UTC
LBFME1Crossroads IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:19:28·2026-07-30 15:45 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:25·2026-07-30 15:29 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:04·2026-07-19 16:49 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:33·2026-07-14 15:23 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:45·2026-07-11 00:05 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:17·2026-07-10 23:50 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:45·2026-07-10 23:25 UTC