← Home

Chaospie

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 524,230 / 40,000 XP
15,770 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Dwarves
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Show all 7
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1041
ELO
#55
23W 12L · 66%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
992
ELO
#143
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#99
#99
Season 1
1,052 pts
27W / 12L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Mullrik
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Simfe
7W 2L
78%
Mullrik
4W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Chaospie & Simfe
7W 1L
88%
Chaospie & Mullrik
4W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Joole & Mullrik
7W 1L
88%
Joole & Simfe
4W 0L
100%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players
WRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:20:522026-03-01 17:41 UTC
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins1 versus 100:13:222026-02-23 13:48 UTC
WRotWKUdunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1066
  • Team average: 1046 against 1045.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1075
Mordor2 versus 200:16:012026-02-23 13:10 UTC
WRotWKStonewain ValleyHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1073
  • Team average: 1041 against 952.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1077
Goblins2 versus 200:31:342026-02-21 22:28 UTC
WRotWKFirien WoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1067
  • Team average: 1025 against 968.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1073
Men2 versus 200:29:342026-02-21 17:27 UTC
WRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1060
  • Team average: 1018 against 975.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1067
Men2 versus 200:10:362026-02-21 17:14 UTC
WRotWKUdunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1052
  • Team average: 1010 against 983.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1060
Angmar2 versus 200:16:222026-02-21 16:28 UTC
WRotWKEred LithuiHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1043
  • Team average: 1001 against 992.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1052
Men2 versus 200:25:042026-02-21 15:59 UTC
WRotWKMoonglade ValeHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1038
  • Team average: 1036 against 957.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1043
Dwarves2 versus 200:13:522026-02-21 15:00 UTC
WRotWKNear KhandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1033
  • Team average: 1031 against 962.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1038
Men2 versus 200:50:052026-02-21 13:35 UTC