← HomeLEVEL
Level 22,300 / 5,000 XP
2,700 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
6W 7L · 46%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
8W 6L · 57%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
0W 1L · 0%
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Salorth
6W 8L, 43% over 14 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Chomper & Salorth
6W 7L
46%
Chomper & fefo & Salorth
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
AKRAMGAMER & KJR01
3W 0L
100%
12 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
No achievements yet.

LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1011
- Opponent rating: 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1006
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:18:09·2026-09-15 15:23 UTC
LRotWKLast BridgeHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1018
- Opponent rating: 1048.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1011
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:23:50·2026-09-15 14:48 UTC
WRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1012
- Opponent rating: 956.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1018
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:36·2026-09-15 14:37 UTC
LRotWKUdun IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 997 against 977.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Isengard·3 versus 3·00:08:27·2026-09-05 20:33 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1032
- Opponent rating: 996.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1022
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:12·2026-09-05 13:52 UTC
LRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1039
- Opponent rating: 1071.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1032
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:05:46·2026-09-04 19:27 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1032
- Opponent rating: 998.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1039
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:50·2026-09-04 18:16 UTC
WRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1025
- Opponent rating: 976.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1032
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:08·2026-09-04 17:48 UTC
WRotWKRiver NimrodelHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1018
- Opponent rating: 983.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1025
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:23·2026-09-04 17:39 UTC
WRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1010
- Opponent rating: 991.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1018
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:55·2026-09-04 17:28 UTC