← Home

Cyber_Wolf

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 532,420 / 40,000 XP
7,580 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Goblins
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Show all 7
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
990
ELO
#676
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
926
ELO
#1707
34W 58L · 37%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1090
#1090
Season 1
963 pts
39W / 66L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Banned Smurf of Orcy
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Cavalon
0W 2L
0%
Banned Smurf of Orcy
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Banned Smurf of Orcy & Cyber_Wolf
1W 0L
100%
AK-47 & Cyber_Wolf
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
EA___ & LeoBonhart
0W 2L
0%
GobGob & Wrogashz
1W 0L
100%
23 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 931
  • Opponent rating: 1006.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 926
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:26·2026-10-09 16:18 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 936
  • Opponent rating: 1015.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 931
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:36·2026-10-09 16:08 UTC
LRotWKRhudaur HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 942
  • Opponent rating: 1010.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 936
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:17·2026-09-29 17:31 UTC
LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 952
  • Opponent rating: 881.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 942
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:14·2026-09-29 17:06 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 952
  • Opponent rating: 942.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 943
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:26:42·2026-09-29 11:47 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 948
  • Opponent rating: 1063.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 945
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:39·2026-09-28 16:28 UTC
LRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 954
  • Opponent rating: 1011.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 948
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:23:52·2026-09-28 15:51 UTC
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 942
  • Opponent rating: 1122.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 941
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:15·2026-09-28 10:31 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 949
  • Opponent rating: 997.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 942
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:21:19·2026-09-28 09:51 UTC
LRotWKMisty MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 950
  • Opponent rating: 1224.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 949
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:12·2026-09-28 09:36 UTC