← Home

DeSespera

📍 Iran
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 410,670 / 20,000 XP
9,330 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#283
6W 2L · 75%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#446
56W 42L · 57%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
999
ELO
#117
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
991
ELO
#144
4W 5L · 44%
RotWKEdain Unchained · 1 versus 1
990
ELO
#111
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#321
#321
Season 1
1,000 pts
1W / 1L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Matty
6W 3L, 67% over 9 games
Matty
6W 3L
67%
Solas
2W 2L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DeSespera & Matty
4W 0L
100%
DeSespera & Matys
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
JohnSauron & Tarranon
2W 0L
100%
Matty & tictactoe
1W 0L
100%
45 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1047
  • Opponent rating: 1093.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1040
Angmar1 versus 100:13:462026-07-07 13:31 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1054
  • Opponent rating: 1086.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1047
Angmar1 versus 100:06:062026-07-07 13:18 UTC
LRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1062
  • Opponent rating: 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1054
Mordor1 versus 100:08:402026-07-07 13:07 UTC
LRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1063
  • Opponent rating: 1228.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1062
Mordor1 versus 100:07:432026-07-07 12:57 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1071
  • Opponent rating: 1087.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1063
Mordor1 versus 100:57:012026-07-07 00:25 UTC
vs Gate
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1080
  • Opponent rating: 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1071
Isengard1 versus 100:14:472026-07-07 00:09 UTC
vs Gate
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1071
  • Opponent rating: 1087.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1080
Mordor1 versus 100:04:452026-07-06 23:58 UTC
vs Gate
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1061
  • Opponent rating: 1097.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1071
Angmar1 versus 100:30:032026-07-06 23:25 UTC
vs Gate
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1071
  • Opponent rating: 997.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1061
Dwarves1 versus 100:17:502026-07-06 23:04 UTC
LRotWKLast BridgeHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1081
  • Opponent rating: 1031.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1071
Angmar1 versus 100:22:212026-07-06 22:32 UTC
vs Filxpw