← Home

Decaest

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 524,000 / 40,000 XP
16,000 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Mordor
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Show all 7
Goblins
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1021
ELO
#218
77W 85L · 48%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#181
3W 3L · 50%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
PlayStation
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
PlayStation
1W 0L
100%
P B R
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Decaest & PlayStation
1W 0L
100%
Decaest & P B R
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Evix & Poperis
2W 0L
100%
JakaSpeed & Youngbalin
1W 0L
100%
17 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Opponent rating: 1028.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1021
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:39:53·2026-11-01 21:08 UTC
WRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1023
  • Opponent rating: 988.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1030
Elves·1 versus 1·00:06:12·2026-10-30 19:04 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1053
  • Opponent rating: 1021.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1043
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:16:34·2026-10-07 17:15 UTC
LRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1059
  • Opponent rating: 1121.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1053
Elves·1 versus 1·00:15:42·2026-10-05 15:49 UTC
WRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1054
  • Opponent rating: 970.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1059
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:07:42·2026-10-05 15:39 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1055
  • Opponent rating: 1210.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1054
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:09:48·2026-10-04 12:01 UTC
WRotWKEryn RhunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 995
  • Team average: 1020 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1003
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:19:20·2026-10-04 11:37 UTC
WRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1045
  • Opponent rating: 1114.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1055
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:11:17·2026-10-01 14:40 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1041
  • Opponent rating: 945.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1045
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:21:27·2026-09-29 16:14 UTC
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1032
  • Opponent rating: 1027.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1041
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:06:08·2026-09-29 16:02 UTC