← Home

Decaest

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 523,840 / 40,000 XP
16,160 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Mordor
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Show all 7
Goblins
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1033
ELO
#193
76W 84L · 48%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#168
3W 3L · 50%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TOP GUN
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
TOP GUN
1W 0L
100%
P B R
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Decaest & TOP GUN
1W 0L
100%
Decaest & P B R
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Evix & Poperis
2W 0L
100%
JakaSpeed & johannesmo
1W 0L
100%
17 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1053
  • Opponent rating: 1021.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1043
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:16:34·2026-10-07 17:15 UTC
LRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1059
  • Opponent rating: 1121.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1053
Elves·1 versus 1·00:15:42·2026-10-05 15:49 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1055
  • Opponent rating: 1210.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1054
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:09:48·2026-10-04 12:01 UTC
LRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Opponent rating: 1087.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1024
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:51·2026-09-28 16:50 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1039
  • Opponent rating: 1030.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1030
Men·1 versus 1·00:14:46·2026-09-28 16:34 UTC
LRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1048
  • Opponent rating: 1021.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1039
Men·1 versus 1·00:09:24·2026-09-28 16:22 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1040
  • Opponent rating: 1105.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1034
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:37:38·2026-09-20 13:51 UTC
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1024
  • Opponent rating: 1176.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1023
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:07:30·2026-09-15 16:38 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Opponent rating: 1072.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1024
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:10:28·2026-09-15 16:24 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Opponent rating: 1072.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1024
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:12:33·2026-09-14 16:39 UTC