← HomeLEVEL
Level 652,010 / 80,000 XP
27,990 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
128W 43L · 75%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
3W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
8W 6L · 57%
Clan wars ladder
A separate ladder from quickmatch. Rated per clan war: two games against another clan.
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Eternity
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Dreadreapr & wowowowow
5W 2L
71%
Dreadreapr & french tax
3W 1L
75%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Matty & wowowowow
1W 4L
20%
Orcmuscle & wowowowow
2W 1L
67%
61 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
Friend of the Free Peoples
Level 2 of 3
only 19 players
The Fellowship
Level 1 of 2
3.1% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1336
- Opponent rating: 1374.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1329
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:42·2026-10-31 05:04 UTC
LRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1343
- Opponent rating: 1183.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1332
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:23:37·2026-10-25 17:05 UTC 
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1323
- Opponent rating: 1295.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1314
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:06:08·2026-10-25 07:17 UTC 
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1305
- Opponent rating: 1145.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1294
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:08·2026-10-23 17:53 UTC 
LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1295
- Opponent rating: 1205.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1285
Men·1 versus 1·00:17:40·2026-10-22 14:01 UTC
LRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1291
- Opponent rating: 1175.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1280
Men·1 versus 1·00:12:35·2026-10-22 10:44 UTC 
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1288
- Opponent rating: 1334.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1281
Men·1 versus 1·00:13:21·2026-10-21 12:36 UTC 
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1299
- Opponent rating: 1102.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -12.
- Rating after: 1287
Men·1 versus 1·00:12:44·2026-10-21 10:34 UTC 
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1287
- Opponent rating: 1377.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1282
Men·1 versus 1·00:05:09·2026-10-20 17:07 UTC LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1270
- Opponent rating: 1344.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1265
Men·1 versus 1·00:16:08·2026-10-19 00:03 UTC
