← HomeLEVEL
Level 539,680 / 40,000 XP
320 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7

Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
48W 6L · 89%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
74W 36L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
34W 31L · 52%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
15W 15L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
2W 5L · 29%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#87
Season 1
1,065 pts
19W / 1L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
BananenBro
5W 0L, 100% over 5 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Dregal & Sody 1 09
47W 17L
73%
Dregal & wowowowow
30W 14L
68%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Masho & Poero & Talos_god
2W 4L
33%
64 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

WRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1222
- Opponent rating: 961.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1223
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:10:25·2026-09-19 23:53 UTC
WRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1217
- Opponent rating: 1145.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1222
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:07:47·2026-09-19 23:43 UTC
WRotWKPelennor FieldsHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·4 versus 4·00:11:00·2026-09-18 23:38 UTC
WRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1214
- Opponent rating: 1099.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1217
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:10:18·2026-09-18 00:09 UTC
WRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1210
- Opponent rating: 1103.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1214
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:08:13·2026-09-17 23:59 UTC
WRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1206
- Opponent rating: 1107.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1210
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:06:30·2026-09-17 23:51 UTC
WRotWKPlains of RohanHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1183
- Team average: 1106 against 1047.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1189
Elves·2 versus 2·00:16:08·2026-09-17 21:47 UTC
WRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1176
- Team average: 1099 against 1061.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1183
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:06:24·2026-09-17 21:38 UTC
WRotWKNanduhirionHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·4 versus 4·00:13:49·2026-09-17 18:55 UTC
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1213
- Opponent rating: 1113.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1217
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:23:03·2026-09-14 01:38 UTC