← Home

Elpacino

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,440 / 5,000 XP
2,560 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
995
ELO
#648
0W 1L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
P B R
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Khalat
0W 2L
0%
P B R
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Elpacino & Khalat
0W 2L
0%
Elpacino & P B R
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
lotor & steve31
1W 1L
50%
AslanBey & Xewix
1W 0L
100%
9 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.
LRotWKArchetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1082.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 995
Elves1 versus 100:19:322026-09-05 08:40 UTC
vs Schere
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:44:532025-07-31 20:48 UTC
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:29:532025-07-15 17:06 UTC
vs Pshebi
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:43:232025-07-12 19:53 UTC
vs TBlack
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:25:472025-07-11 09:32 UTC
LRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:46:092025-07-09 14:21 UTC
vs Pshebi
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:14:562025-07-06 15:51 UTC
LRotWKLast BridgeHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:06:532025-07-02 21:22 UTC
LRotWKSouthfarthingHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves2 versus 200:11:282025-07-01 21:31 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:14:292025-07-01 20:35 UTC