← Home

EnSabahNur

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 23,280 / 5,000 XP
1,720 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#311
#311
Season 2
1,008 pts
1W / 0L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#454
#454
Season 2
993 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#624
#962
Season 2
892 pts
8W / 26L
2026-11-01
#624
Season 1
961 pts
2W / 8L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#272
#272
Season 2
992 pts
0W / 2L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Krecik
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Jackasss
4W 9L
31%
Frodo
2W 7L
22%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
EnSabahNur & Frodo & Jackasss
2W 6L
25%
Aragornn & EnSabahNur & Jackasss
0W 2L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
King_Elessar & Krecik & noob777
0W 2L
0%
makyyy & Petrolik & TumiCZ
0W 2L
0%
58 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Fangorn ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 975.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1008
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:00:56·2026-10-21 23:00 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 896
  • Team average: 939 against 1036.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 892
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:10·2026-10-21 21:50 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 900
  • Team average: 973 against 1076.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 896
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:51·2026-09-19 18:32 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 901
  • Team average: 1029 against 1175.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 900
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:28:10·2026-09-19 17:50 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 902
  • Team average: 1013 against 1174.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 901
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:09·2026-09-19 17:35 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 891
  • Team average: 967 against 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 902
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:46:36·2026-09-11 21:34 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 884
  • Team average: 1041 against 1000.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 891
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:24:12·2026-09-10 20:17 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 874
  • Team average: 1014 against 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 884
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:04·2026-09-10 19:39 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 882
  • Team average: 947 against 969.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 874
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:11·2026-09-10 19:23 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 877
  • Team average: 1010 against 939.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 882
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:15·2026-09-10 19:07 UTC