← Home

Fean0r

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,640 / 5,000 XP
2,360 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Angmar
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Show all 8
Isengard
RotWK
Gondor
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
999
ELO
#355
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
924
ELO
#1820
10W 24L · 29%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Ennorath
2 versus 2 · RotWK
BEST
#93
#93
Season 1
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-10-28

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Takizava
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Takizava
0W 1L
0%
Supr1m
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Fean0r & Takizava
0W 1L
0%
Fean0r & Supr1m
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
karifito & Lev_05
0W 1L
0%
I. Selim & TheKing
0W 1L
0%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLostAny queueSolo queueParty games
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 922
  • Opponent rating: 1068.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 921
Elves·1 versus 1·00:07:39·2026-06-06 18:08 UTC
LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Opponent rating: 1089.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 922
Elves·1 versus 1·00:07:56·2026-06-06 17:55 UTC
LRotWKOst-in-EdhilHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:21:30·2026-06-06 17:30 UTC
LRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 929
  • Opponent rating: 995.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 923
Elves·1 versus 1·00:09:51·2026-06-02 17:54 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 924
  • Opponent rating: 995.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 919
Men·1 versus 1·00:16:43·2026-06-02 16:56 UTC
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 927
  • Opponent rating: 1050.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 924
Elves·1 versus 1·00:17:30·2026-06-02 12:14 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 932
  • Opponent rating: 1012.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 927
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:09:44·2026-06-01 20:27 UTC
LRotWKRhudaur HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 936
  • Opponent rating: 1030.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 932
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:57·2026-06-01 20:06 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 945
  • Opponent rating: 954.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 936
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:00:34·2026-06-01 19:59 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 952
  • Opponent rating: 990.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 945
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:10:14·2026-06-01 19:41 UTC